MHB Modulus problem with a negative sign

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving modulus problems with a negative sign, highlighting two methods presented in a video. The first method is traditional, while the second involves using a number line and graphing the function f(x) = |x+4| - |x| - |x-3|. The graph shows that f(x) does not intersect y = 12, indicating no solutions for f(x) = 12, while it suggests two solutions for f(x) = 2. To find these solutions, one can derive linear equations from specific points on the graph and solve for x. Understanding the second method's name would aid in further research on the topic.
Nousher Ahmed
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In a video, a person discussed how to solve modulus problems with a negative sign. This is the link of that video lecture.

He showed two methods to solve the problem. The first method is commonly used. Later he showed another method where he used a number line and a graph.

Unfortunately, I couldn't understand his explanation properly. What is the original name of the second method he discussed in that video? If I could learn the actual name of the second method, I could googled to learn more about that.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
He is just plotting the function $f(x) = |x+4| - |x| - |x-3|$ using the coordinate values $(-4,f(-4))$, $(0,f(0))$, and $(3, f(3))$. He selects two more x-values, one > 3 and the other < -4, and evaluates the function at those other two to predict the behavior of the graph.

Note the graph's highest y-value is at $(3, f(3))$ ... it never gets as high as 12, indicating no solution to the equation.

Unfortunately, he doesn't say what to do if, say, $f(x) = 2$ instead of $f(x)=12$. Still, one can see by the graph there would be two possible solutions.

abs_func.jpg
 
@skeeter , Will you please say what we could do if f(x)=2 instead of f(x)=12?

And probably for f(x)=12, still there might be two possible solutions. Will you please say what those solutions are, and how to find out those solutions?
 
f(x) = 12 has no solutions ... note the graph of f(x) does not intersect the horizontal line y = 12.

If f(x) = 2, I would find the linear equation of the line between the points $(0,f(0))$ and $(3,f(3))$, set it equal to 2 and solve for x.

Do the same for the linear equation of the line between the points $(3,f(3))$ and say, $(5,f(5))$ and follow the same procedure.
 
skeeter said:
f(x) = 12 has no solutions ... note the graph of f(x) does not intersect the horizontal line y = 12.

If f(x) = 2, I would find the linear equation of the line between the points $(0,f(0))$ and $(3,f(3))$, set it equal to 2 and solve for x.

Do the same for the linear equation of the line between the points $(3,f(3))$ and say, $(5,f(5))$ and follow the same procedure.
Thanks a lot for your cordial help.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top