Moment about a point in trusses

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of moments about point C in a truss system, specifically addressing the contributions of various forces and their distances from the point of interest. Participants explore the application of free body diagrams and the principles of moment calculation in the context of a homework problem.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the inclusion of the moment 3.2(4) in the calculations, suggesting it is centered at point F rather than C.
  • Another participant explains that summing moments about C is necessary to determine the force in FE, as summing about A or B would not yield a solution due to the force action line passing through those joints.
  • There is a discussion about the moment 6(5) being the moment of the horizontal reaction force at A about point C.
  • Some participants assert that the moment 3.2(4) is indeed a moment about C, despite being centered at F, emphasizing that moment is calculated as force times the perpendicular distance from the line of action to the point of interest.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the application of the 3.2 kN force at A and its relevance to the moment about C, questioning how the perpendicular distance is measured.
  • Another participant clarifies that the perpendicular distance from the line of action of the 3.2 kN force to C is also 4 m, suggesting a method for calculating moments.
  • There is a challenge regarding the understanding of how to calculate moments using perpendicular distances from the force line of action.
  • A later reply points out potential errors in the author's calculations of reactions based on the dimensions and loads given, suggesting a reevaluation of the vertical reaction at A by summing moments about B.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of the moment 3.2(4) in the calculations and how to properly calculate moments about point C. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations of the moment calculations and the application of forces.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about the distances and points of application of forces, as well as potential inaccuracies in the author's calculations of reactions.

chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



for moment about C, the author gave [-F_(FE)](5) +3.2(4) +6(5) = 0
i don't understand the working...Why there are moment 3.2(4) and also moment 6(5)?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


for moment 3.2(4) , it's centered at F, so ,it's not moment about C ,am i right?
for moment 6(5) , it's moment about A, am i right?

[/B]
 

Attachments

  • 333.jpg
    333.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
The author has isolated the bot left section in a free body diagram. In order to determine the force in FE, you need to sum moments about C because summing about A or B wil not allow solution of the FE force because the force action line passes through those joints. The 6(5) moment you talk about is the moment of the horizontal reaction force at A about C.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
The author has isolated the bot left section in a free body diagram. In order to determine the force in FE, you need to sum moments about C because summing about A or B wil not allow solution of the FE force because the force action line passes through those joints. The 6(5) moment you talk about is the moment of the horizontal reaction force at A about C.
how about moment 3.2(4) ? it's moment about F,am i right? why the author included it into calculation?
 
chetzread said:
how about moment 3.2(4) ? it's moment about F,am i right? why the author included it into calculation?
Well it is a moment about F, but it also is a moment about C, which is the point of interest . Remenber that moment is force times perpendicular distance from line of action of that force to the point of interest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
Well it is a moment about F, but it also is a moment about C, which is the point of interest . Remenber that moment is force times perpendicular distance from line of action of that force to the point of interest.
i still don't understand...
the perpendicular distance is the 4m(see red labelled part), it's span from F to A, so moment is about F, not C, am i right?
 

Attachments

  • 333.jpg
    333.jpg
    35.7 KB · Views: 514
The perpendicular distance from the line of action of the 3.2 kN force to C is also 4 m. Just extend the 3.2 kN force arrow straight up and measure the perp distance from that line to C. This is one of several methods to calculate moments.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
The perpendicular distance from the line of action of the 3.2 kN force to C is also 4 m. Just extend the 3.2 kN force arrow straight up and measure the perp distance from that line to C. This is one of several methods to calculate moments.
but,the force 3.2kN is being applied at A, not 4m away from C, how can we dothat?
 
PhanthomJay said:
why not?
The force is not applied at C, but at A
 
  • #10
you are not understanding how to calculate moments using perpendicular distances from the force line of action.

Now I just noticed the reactions are incorrectly calculated by the author, based on the dimensions and loads given. . You might want to find the correct vertical reaction at A by looking at the entire truss and summing moments about B and report your result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K