Moment of Inertia and the parallel axis theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of a nonuniform rod system with an attached block and bullet. The participant initially considers using the parallel axis theorem but realizes it is not applicable since the rotational axis is not at the center of mass of the rod. Instead, they confirm that the rotational inertia of the rod is given about the fixed axis at the top end. The conversation also touches on the conservation of angular momentum, clarifying that the entire system's mass cannot be treated as a point mass when calculating angular velocity after the bullet impacts the block. Ultimately, the participant acknowledges the need to use the moment of inertia for the entire system to achieve the correct results.
mdk31
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem that involves a vertical axis that can rotate through a fixed axis located at the very top of the rod, at point A (the axis is coming out towards us, the rod's rotation would look like a pendulum). The rod is nonuniform and there is a block attached to the rod. A bullet is fired at the block, causing the block-bullet-rod system to rotate. I must find the rotational inertia of the block-rod-bullet system. We are told to treat the block as a particle

The mass of the bullet is .01 kg
The mass of the block .50 kg.
The rotational inertia of the rod alone is .060 kg-m^2
The length of the rod is .60 m.
The mass of the rod is .50 kg.


Homework Equations


I=I[center of mass] + Mh^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking about using the parallel axis theorem, where the .060 was the I[cm] and Mh^2 was the total mass of the bullet and block times the length of the rod squared. But I then I realized that the rotational axis was not at the rod's center of mass. I'm really not sure how to proceed...I'm stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"The rotational inertia of the rod alone is .060 kg-m^2"

is this rotational inertia about the rod's center of mass, or about the end of the rod?
 
It is the rotational inertia of the rod about the fixed axis at A, at the top end of the rod.
 
Ok. So add to that number... the moment of inertias of the box and the bullet... treat them as point particles... the moment of inertia of a point particle is mr^2.
 
So this problem really has nothing to do with the parallel axis theorem does it?
 
mdk31 said:
So this problem really has nothing to do with the parallel axis theorem does it?

I don't think so...
 
No, it doesn't seem to. I was being stupid about it.

Thanks for you help though!
 
I just looked at this problem again and realized that it also wants us to find the speed of the bullet just before impact. The angular speed of the system immediately after impact is given as 4.5 rad/s.

I know I'm supposed to use conservation of angular momentum rm[0]v[0]sin(x)=Iw

(w is omega)

and I understand that. But why can't I use rm[0]v[0]sin(x)=rm[1]v[1]sin(x) where m[0] is the mass of just the bullet, m[1] is the mass of the bullet, block, and rod, and v[1] is wr. When I try to find the velocity this way, I get the wrong answer.
 
mdk31 said:
But why can't I use rm[0]v[0]sin(x)=rm[1]v[1]sin(x) where m[0] is the mass of just the bullet, m[1] is the mass of the bullet, block, and rod, and v[1] is wr. When I try to find the velocity this way, I get the wrong answer.

The angular momentum after the collision is not: rm[1]v[1]sin(x)... this presumes the entire mass m[1] is located at a distance r from the pivot. it's not. rmv only holds for point masses. you need to use the moment of inertia of the bullet/block/rod system.
 
  • #10
Yes, you ought to get wrong answer.. because, when you do so, you are assuming that rod can also be treated as a point mass located at the impact-point.. which is NOT true... as rod is having mass (non-uniform).
 
  • #11
I see, that makes sense.

Thanks!
 
Back
Top