Momentum Conservation: Large vs Small Car

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum in collisions between a large car (truck) and a small car, specifically examining which vehicle undergoes a greater change in momentum and the implications for passenger safety. The scope includes theoretical considerations of momentum conservation, the nature of collisions (elastic vs. inelastic), and the effects of mass on velocity changes during a collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario with specific masses and velocities to analyze momentum changes, suggesting that the changes in momentum are different due to their signs.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to specify the type of collision (elastic or inelastic) and provides an equation for a non-elastic collision, calculating a final velocity for both vehicles.
  • Some participants note that momentum change is equal and opposite for both vehicles, but the change in velocity and kinetic energy dissipation differs significantly due to mass differences.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications for passenger safety, with discussions on how the change in velocity for the smaller car could lead to greater forces experienced by occupants.
  • There is speculation that the smaller car's occupants may experience a greater impact due to the combined effects of their vehicle's backward motion and the truck's forward motion.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between mass, velocity changes, and the resulting forces on passengers, questioning how these factors contribute to injury severity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that momentum is conserved and that the changes in momentum for both vehicles are equal and opposite. However, there is no consensus on the implications of these changes for passenger safety, as multiple views on the effects of mass and velocity changes remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions made about the type of collision and the specific numerical values used in the examples, which may not reflect realistic scenarios. The discussion also highlights the complexity of real-world collisions, including factors like crumple zones and the time taken to come to a halt.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, particularly in the areas of mechanics and collision dynamics, as well as individuals interested in vehicle safety and accident analysis.

toesockshoe
Messages
265
Reaction score
2
The question is: When a large car collides with a small car, which one undergoes the greater change in momentum: the large one or the small one? Or is it the same for both?

I wanted to plug in dumb numbers:
m_tv_{ti} + m_cv_{ci} = m_tv_{tf} + m_cv_{cf}
lets assume the truck has a mass of 10000kg and the car has a mass of 10kg (lets not care about realisticness)
also let's assume that the initial velocity of the truck is 10 m/s and the cars is -2m/s (assuming the truck is going in the positive direction). Let the final velocity of the truck be 5m/s. Plugging all of these numbers into the top equation, we get that the final velocity of the car HAS to be: 4998 m/s. Again the numbers arent realistic, but that isn't really important. The change in momentum of the truck is: m_tv_{ti} - m_tv_{tf} = 50000 Ns and the change in the momentum of the car is -50000. So are the changes different? One is NEGATIVE 50000 while the other is positive... I would assume they are different...

Also, the 2nd part of the question asks why passengers in the small car are more likely to get hurt... I have no idea how to answer this question... any hints? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, there is more to a collision than just conservation of momentum. You also need to know (or specify) whether the collision is elastic, non-elastic or something in between. Also, you cannot specify the speed after the collision, just the momenta.

So: In this case I would assume a non-elastic collision (both having the same speed after the collision). This gives v_{tf}=v_{cf}. Your equation will then be m_{t}v_{ti}+m_{c}v_{ci}=(m_{t}+m_{c})v_{tf}. Plug in your numbers and you get v_{tf}=\frac{10000\cdot 10+10\cdot(-2)}{10000+10}\frac{m}{s}\approx 9.99 \frac{m}{s}.
 
As momentum is conserved the change in momentum is equal and opposite for two objects in collision.

As for your question about passengers getting injured. What can you say about how the change in velocity of the two objects is related to their mass?
 
toesockshoe said:
which one undergoes the greater change in momentum
This is potentially a very complicated problem. People often post questions about their recent traffic accident / insurance claims. Basic Physics cannot help them, I'm afraid but it's an interesting thing to study.
The momentum change has to be the same for both cars (different signs, of course). However, what counts is the change in velocity and, importantly, the way that the dissipated Kinetic Energy is shared between them. (KE is not conserved.) More of the energy of the collision will be dissipated on the smaller vehicle (KE = mv2/2 and the velocity is squared so faster means much more KE).
The fact that the truck and car may apply brakes afterwards can cloud the issue about what actually happens. You have to ignore this for a simple treatment.
As for what happens to the occupants, you have, effectively, a sequence of collisions. Car to Truck then car to occupant. Each collision will take a finite time. What happens to the occupants will depend upon the time taken to come to a halt. Your truck may (probably will) push the small car backwards, making the change in velocity for the occupants even worse.
Change in momentum is called Impulse. Impulse is Force times the time it's applied for. Being brought to a halt slowly (crumple zone and resilient seat belt) will bring you to rest over a longer time and involves a smaller Force.
Sitting down with a pencil and paper and drawing some diagrams can help in getting an idea of what's "really" happening. If you apply Newton's Laws of motion rigidly, the situation can get much clearer.
And you will often notice that intuition can take you in the wrong direction.
 
PeroK said:
As momentum is conserved the change in momentum is equal and opposite for two objects in collision.

As for your question about passengers getting injured. What can you say about how the change in velocity of the two objects is related to their mass?
right, although the changes in momenti are the same, one object has a much smaller mass meaning it would have a much greater velocity than the other mass. Does this mean that the person in the small car would hit the airbag or steering wheel with a much greater momentum (separate from the cars momentum)?
 
toesockshoe said:
the person in the small car would hit the airbag or steering wheel with a much greater momentum
Yes. The steering wheel could actually be coming towards him, pushed by the truck. Two velocities would add together.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Yes. The steering wheel could actually be coming towards him, pushed by the truck. Two velocities would add together.
im still not too sure why the smaller car passengers feel it more... if the velocity changes faster does this mean acceleration is greater and the force at which he hits the steering wheel will also be greater?
 
The massive truck may only slow down a bit. The small car can end up being carried backwards fast. (This is just after the impact.) so the change In its velocity can be much more than for the truck.briefly, the occupant could still be moving in the original direction and meet the steering wheel coming back towards him.
This is yet another situation where the Maths can give a good explanation when you start with a couple of basic formulae.
Momentum is conserved ( for a start). KE will not be. KE is 'shared out' unequally and the smaller mass cops the worst of it.
"Force of impact" is not a meaningful term; Force X distance (= Work) and Force X Time (impulse) are the relevant quantities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K