Momentum in a Head-on collision

AI Thread Summary
In a head-on collision between an electron and a muon, the reaction produces an electron neutrino and a muon neutrino. The center of mass frame energy is calculated to be 84 GeV, leading to a muon neutrino energy of 60 GeV, with its momentum approximated as p ~ E/c due to the negligible mass of neutrinos. The discussion highlights the necessity to determine the direction of the muon neutrino's momentum, as momentum is a vector quantity. Additionally, the problem provides more information than needed, raising questions about the relevance of the given angle. Ultimately, the angle of the muon neutrino was calculated to be 10.8 degrees with respect to the incoming muon direction.
Rayan
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Misplaced Homework Thread
An electron and muon collide head-on, with energies 35 GeV and 50 GeV, the following reaction takes place:

$$ e^- + \mu^+ \rightarrow \nu_e + \nu_{\vec{\mu}} $$If the electron neutrino has energy of 25 GeV, and collides at angle 20 with respect to incoming electron direction, what is the muon neutrinos momentum?

Now I calculated the center of mass frame energy, which happened to be 84 GeV, and I was thinking that I can use energy conservation to determine muon neutrinos energy:

E = 60 GeV

and then since neutrinos mass is very small it can be neglected, so E ~ pc and therefore p~E/c .

But why is the angle between electron and electron neutrino given? Am I missing something here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You calculated the magnitude of the momentum. The momentum is a vector and you should find its direction.

It's interesting that the problem statement gives you more information than required to solve the problem. Just giving the angle or the energy would be sufficient.
 
mfb said:
You calculated the magnitude of the momentum. The momentum is a vector and you should find its direction.

It's interesting that the problem statement gives you more information than required to solve the problem. Just giving the angle or the energy would be sufficient.
You are totally right! I did calculate the angle and got

$$\theta=10.8^{\circ}$$

with respect to the direction of incoming muon.

But I did indeed use the energy in my calculation! I can't really think of a way to determine the angle without using it?
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top