Momentum-Parity, ground state quantum no even-even odd-odd

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Notation: ##J^p## - ##J## the total angular momentum, ##p## the parity = ##+## or ## -. ##

Ok so I'm given a diagram of energy levels, all have a ground state of ##0+##, except one which has a ground state of ##1+##.
I'm askeed to indentify which set of energy levels belong to which nucleus, the nuclei are all even-even except Fe : ##A=18, Z=9##,
So the answer is that ## 1+ ## ground state is only possible from Fe, and that all even-even nuclei must have a ground state of ##0+##.

Questions:
- I don't understand why ANY even-even nuclei has ##J^p=0^+##. I know that a filled shell has ##J=0 ##So this is fine for double-magic nucleus, but not for a magic, or general even-even nucleus.

- I don't understand the addition of angular momenta given by my textbook :
Because both neutrons and protons have one nucleon in the ##1d^{5/2}## level, the addition of angular momenta is: ##J=5/2+5/2=5,4,3,2,1##*

What I don't understand is which angular momenta you are supposed to be adding so here there's only one extra proton/neutron, but in general, for a odd-odd nuclei say you had 3 extra protons in a energy level, say it has ##J=J_{p} ##and 1 extra neutron in a energy level, say J##=J_{n} ##, then how should the addition work? Would you add ##J_{p}## and ##J_{n} ## in accord to * ? how would you account for the fact there are 3 extra protons but only one extra neutron?

- In terms of addition of angular momentum, how do you see it sums to ##0 ##for an even-even nuclei. I see that as magic numbers are even, there will be an even number of surplus nucleons in a energy level for non double-magic numbers. Does this somehow differ the addition of ##J## compared to odd-odd so that 0 is possible?

Thanks any help really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The strong force is not a nice 1/r^2 potential, while you still get some shell-like structure all different orbitals within those shells have different energies. As a result, they are always filled in pairs (spin up/down), so every pair of protons (and neutrons) will cancel each other in terms of spin contribution.
At most, you have one proton and one neutron to consider for the ground-state.
 
mfb said:
..will cancel each other in terms of spin contribution.
.

So it is assumed that ##l=0##? (The question does not say.)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top