Momentum problem driving me crazy.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demondo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a bullet penetrating a block of wood under different conditions. When the block is fixed in a vise, the bullet penetrates to a depth of 8 cm, as all its kinetic energy is used for penetration. However, when the block is on a frictionless surface, the bullet's penetration depth is expected to be less due to the block's movement absorbing some of the bullet's energy. The conversation emphasizes the conservation of momentum and energy transfer during the collision, suggesting that the bullet will still penetrate but not as deeply. Overall, the scenario illustrates the impact of motion on energy distribution in inelastic collisions.
Demondo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I asked this on IRC but with only 7 people there, including myself, I'm not too confident I'll get an answer anyway...
A 7g bulet, when fired from a gun into a 1kg block of wood held in a vise, penetrates the block to a depth of 8cm. What If? This block of wood is placed on a frictionless horizontal surface, and a second 7g bullet is fired from the gun into the block. To what depth will the bullet penetrate the block in this case?
It seems like such an odd question because you aren't given the bullet's speed. Anyone have any idea what would happen? It is possible that the bullet would push the block, but that just doesn't seem likely at all because of it's speed. Or it could puncture just as deeply, but this time the block moves. But I'm really uncertain about what happens. Any help would be appraicted. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Impulse... I think the bullet still goes in regardless... Probably not as deep or will not penetrate it... It will be a perfect inelastic collision where the 2 masses become one...

Say... If someone where to shoot you with a paintball gun in the face and you had your mask on... You would get paint all over your face. If you were to stand on ice or some frictionless surface and the same situation occured... You still get paint over your face and a fun slide in the direction of the paintball...

Thats what I think at least...
 
If you make a few simplifying assumptions, the problem is straightforward.

With the wood in the vise, all the kinetic energy of the bullet goes into penetrating the wood and thus is transformed into thermal energy. We'll make the simplifying assumption that the force between the bullet and wood is uniform: thus the given KE of the bullet leads to the given penetration, FxD = ΔKE.

With the wood free to move, assume that the bullet will again penetrate the wood making the collision perfectly inelastic. (Not unreasonable.) Apply conservation of momentum to get the speed of the block plus bullet post collision, then use that speed to calculate its KE. Now find the ΔKE during the collision--that's the energy used to penetrate the wood. In this case the penetration is less because some of the bullet's energy is used to accelerate the wood.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top