Moon orbiting close to its host planet

  • Thread starter Thread starter willstaruss22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Planet
AI Thread Summary
A moon can orbit closely to its host planet with limited to no tidal heating if it maintains a perfectly circular orbit and always presents the same face to the planet, resulting in no change in gravitational field and thus no tidal forces. However, if the orbit is eccentric, tidal heating will occur due to the gravitational variations experienced by different parts of the moon. Proximity to the planet affects the period of solar tides, which can produce some heating, but the influence of the planet's tides can be minimal if the orbit is nearly circular. Ultimately, while proximity is a factor, the moon's orbital characteristics and the nature of its gravitational interactions play a more significant role in determining tidal heating. Therefore, a moon can theoretically have limited tidal heating despite being close to its host planet under specific conditions.
willstaruss22
Messages
108
Reaction score
1
Can a moon orbit close to its host planet and have no tidal heating?
Say there is a moon with 0.5 Earth masses and 0.8 Earth radii orbiting a Jupiter mass planet every 18 hours with an eccentricity of 0.00001. There are no moons within 3 million miles of the exomoon in question. Could this moon have limited to no tidal heating or does the proximity of the moon to the host planet guarantee some tidal heating?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
hi willstaruss22! :wink:

tidal heating is caused by squeezing and stretching as the moon changes shape

the change of shape is caused by the gravitational force changing on
different parts of the moon

if the moon has a perfectly circular orbit (and the planet has a perfectly circular gravitational field), and if the moon always keeps the same face towards the planet, then there wil be no change in the gravitational field, and no tidal forces or tidal heating

in any other case, there will be :smile:
 
Proximity of the planet is not very relevant. There IS a minimum level of tidal acceleration gradient due to the star. Meaning that the moon will experience solar tides, just like a lone planet would.

There is a small relevance to the proximity of the planet: the distance to the planet dictates the period of solar tides, and therefore their heat production.

The planetary tides can be arbitrarily weak, because the orbit can be arbitrarily close to circle. They, however, can only amplify tides: they cannot in long term cancel the solar tides because they have different period. Solar tides have about two high tides per orbit, tides due to eccentric orbit have one high tide per orbit.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top