More than 3 eigenvectors perpendicluar

  • Thread starter Thread starter ss k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
ss k
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
all the eigenvectors of a matrix are perpendicular, ie. at right angles to each other, HOW?
I can imagine three eigenvectors as three perpendicular axes. How can be more than three axes are perpendicular with respect to each other?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In a two-dimensional space such as the surface of a sheet of paper you can only have two mutually perpendicular axes. In a three-dimensional space you can have three. You cannot visualize a four-dimensional space, but mathematically it's a perfectly sensible concept - and how many axes do you need there?

You just need a definition of "perpendicular" that's not tied to your ability to visualize 90-degree angles.
 
  • Like
Likes ss k
Nugatory said:
In a two-dimensional space such as the surface of a sheet of paper you can only have two mutually perpendicular axes. In a three-dimensional space you can have three. You cannot visualize a four-dimensional space, but mathematically it's a perfectly sensible concept - and how many axes do you need there?

You just need a definition of "perpendicular" that's not tied to your ability to visualize 90-degree angles.
Hi Nugatory,

Thanks usually there are n-vectors so n-axes and all are perpendicular with respect to each other. I don't want to plot them or see in some 3-d graphics programme but just wondering how they can even exist. Let's say I have 4 such axes (having values from -,0,+ and center orgin at 0) then axis 1,2,3 can be perpendicular with each other and how come the 4th axis will be perpendicular to any other axis.
 
What do you understand by "vectors"? It is possible to have a vector space of any dimension (even infinite dimensional vector spaces are used). You seem to be thinking of vectors in three dimensional space. If that is what you mean, then, yes, you cannot have more than three mutually orthogonal vectors. But that is dealing with physics, not mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes ss k and Doug Huffman
ss k said:
Hi Nugatory,

Thanks usually there are n-vectors so n-axes and all are perpendicular with respect to each other. I don't want to plot them or see in some 3-d graphics programme but just wondering how they can even exist. Let's say I have 4 such axes (having values from -,0,+ and center orgin at 0) then axis 1,2,3 can be perpendicular with each other and how come the 4th axis will be perpendicular to any other axis.
Consider the three dimensional case. Pick any two axis and ignore the third. Those two are in a 2 dimensional plane and the axes are at right angles.

But if we can ignore the third axis, we can go to more dimensions and ignore more axis.

In four dimensional space, pick any two dimensions. They form a two dimensional space and the axes are at right angles. Ignore the other axis. Since the two you picked were arbitrary, all the axis are perpendicular to all the others.

This works for any number of higher dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes ss k
Thanks all on PF. I think Factchecker replied exactly I was looking for.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top