What hidden world did I discover with my microscope and camera?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Janus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a photo contest entry featuring Mt. St. Helens volcanic ash captured using a macro camera feature. This prompted the user to explore the potential of an old Bristol model 8821 microscope they had rescued from disposal. After retrieving the microscope, they experimented with viewing the ash under magnification and found that using their cell phone camera to capture images through the eyepiece yielded surprisingly good results, despite the challenges of positioning the phone correctly. They also discussed the possibility of using different eyepieces for better focus and considered various phone mounts for improved photography. Additional images taken included dust, spices, a meteorite surface, and tarnished coins, showcasing the microscope's capabilities. The user expressed a desire to see more microscope images from others, highlighting the interest in microscopy as both a hobby and a decorative element in their home.
Janus
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
3,747
Reaction score
1,933
In the photo contest this week I posted a picture of some Mt. St. Helens volcanic ash taken with the macro feature of my camera. This got me thinking. Several years ago I rescued an microscope that was headed for the trash heap. It is this Bristol model 8821.
microscope.png

I put it in the attic and forgot about it.

Now I began to wonder what the ash would look like under the microscope, so I got it down. The light still worked, so I put some ash on a slide and took a look.

I also noticed, after digging around in the box it came in, that there was an adapter for attaching an camera. Unfortunately, our digital camera isn't designed with a removable lens, but I thought I try something else, hold my cell phone camera up to the eye piece.
These are two of the photos I was able to capture:
microash1.png

microash2.png

Not too bad considering the method used.
 

Attachments

  • microash1.png
    microash1.png
    74.1 KB · Views: 576
  • microash2.png
    microash2.png
    72.6 KB · Views: 577
  • microscope.png
    microscope.png
    65.9 KB · Views: 885
  • Like
Likes davenn, LLD1231, russ_watters and 5 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Speaking of microscope rescue, many years ago these old, optical microscopes were on their way to the dumpster when a chemistry department no longer wanted them. I, on the other hand, see them as antiques, and they have been used as part of my decor alongside an old chemical balance and a very old Weston multimeter housed inside a wooden box. They all fit rather well within a mid-century modern furniture.

DSCN3760.JPG

Zz.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN3760.JPG
    DSCN3760.JPG
    71.6 KB · Views: 824
  • Like
Likes berkeman, davenn, LLD1231 and 7 others
ZapperZ said:
Speaking of microscope rescue, many years ago these old, optical microscopes were on their way to the dumpster when a chemistry department no longer wanted them. I, on the other hand, see them as antiques, and they have been used as part of my decor alongside an old chemical balance and a very old Weston multimeter housed inside a wooden box. They all fit rather well within a mid-century modern furniture.

View attachment 228783
Zz.
My kind of decor.
 
So, with a little experimenting, I found out that I got better results if I switched out the eyepiece( it came with some extra ones) for a different focal length, I got better results with my cell phone. ( though its still a hassle getting the lens positioned just right and hold it in place. I'm going have to see if I can come up with some kind of mount for it.)
I also tried using direct lighting rather than back light to see what kind of result that would give.
Here are three more attempts at three different magnifications:
microash3.png


microash4.png
microash5.png
 

Attachments

  • microash3.png
    microash3.png
    41.9 KB · Views: 874
  • microash4.png
    microash4.png
    199.9 KB · Views: 814
  • microash5.png
    microash5.png
    131.8 KB · Views: 885
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic, Psinter and DennisN
Janus said:
I also noticed, after digging around in the box it came in, that there was an adapter for attaching an camera. Unfortunately, our digital camera isn't designed with a removable lens, but I thought I try something else, hold my cell phone camera up to the eye piece.
We just recently talked about phone mounts for telescopes in this thread. There are different phone mounts, and I have two models which can be seen in photos below. With my telescope setup, they are however not so good choices, but I am thinking about trying out this mount, https://www.meade.com/smart-phone-adapter.html (by Meade), which @MP9721NRC uses. I would not be surprised if it works for microscopes too.

Edit: My phone (LG G4) has got a really good camera, and it can be manually controlled, and it is far better than my Olympus compact camera, so that is why I am testing out phone mounts.

Phone mount 1:
43842437761_bd6c60f992_z.jpg


Phone mount 1 applied:
42033849310_9d9570c1ec_z.jpg


Phone mount 2:
43842436871_6253e86bda_z.jpg


Phone mount 2 applied:
42033848570_4510a7ef82_z.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 42033849310_9d9570c1ec_z.jpg
    42033849310_9d9570c1ec_z.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 530
  • 43842437761_bd6c60f992_z.jpg
    43842437761_bd6c60f992_z.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 483
  • 43842436871_6253e86bda_z.jpg
    43842436871_6253e86bda_z.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 532
  • 42033848570_4510a7ef82_z.jpg
    42033848570_4510a7ef82_z.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 501
  • Like
Likes Janus
DennisN said:
We just recently talked about phone mounts for telescopes in this thread. There are different phone mounts, and I have two models which can be seen in photos below. With my telescope setup, they are however not so good choices, but I am thinking about trying out this mount, https://www.meade.com/smart-phone-adapter.html (by Meade), which @MP9721NRC uses. I would not be surprised if it works for microscopes too.
Thanks. This looks like something that might work, or At something I can modify enough to make work.
Meanwhile, I took a few more pictures last night using the "hold the phone by hand" method.
gunk.png

"Dust" collected from an outside window sill. There may still be some ash left over from last year's Eagle Creek fire mixed in here.

ginger.png

Some ginger from the spice rack.

meteor.png

The surface of a meteorite I picked up in a fossil store last summer. The line going for lower left to upper right to the naked eye just looks like a fine crack.

penny.png

Surface of a old tarnished penny

slvrspn.png

Tarnished surface of a silver spoon

spdrwb.png

Some spider webbing
 

Attachments

  • gunk.png
    gunk.png
    112.1 KB · Views: 523
  • ginger.png
    ginger.png
    90.6 KB · Views: 478
  • meteor.png
    meteor.png
    102.6 KB · Views: 495
  • penny.png
    penny.png
    164.9 KB · Views: 475
  • slvrspn.png
    slvrspn.png
    140.4 KB · Views: 500
  • spdrwb.png
    spdrwb.png
    54.4 KB · Views: 525
  • Like
Likes davenn, Asymptotic, Psinter and 1 other person
I like this thread. I don't have a microscope. I want to see more pictures taken with microscopes :approve:.
 
Janus said:
So, with a little experimenting, I found out that I got better results if I switched out the eyepiece( it came with some extra ones) for a different focal length, I got better results with my cell phone. ( though its still a hassle getting the lens positioned just right and hold it in place. I'm going have to see if I can come up with some kind of mount for it.)
I also tried using direct lighting rather than back light to see what kind of result that would give.
Here are three more attempts at three different magnifications:
View attachment 228793

View attachment 228794 View attachment 228795

Wow! Those images are amazing.
 
Back
Top