Moseley's law and the determination of the screening constant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Moseley's law in a laboratory context, specifically focusing on the determination of the screening constant ##\sigma_{n_1,n_2}## after measuring x-ray fluorescence spectra of metallic samples. The challenge arises from the dependency of the screening constant on the atomic number ##Z##, complicating the fitting of a linear function to the data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the idea of plotting a transformed version of Moseley's law to extract constants from the data. There is discussion about the linear behavior of the curve and the necessity to fit data for different electronic transitions separately. Questions are raised regarding the implications of the screening constant being a function of the atomic number.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing suggestions for data analysis and discussing the need to categorize transitions. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive ideas are being exchanged regarding how to approach the fitting process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the screening constant ##\sigma## may take on negative values for certain atomic numbers, which adds complexity to the analysis. The original poster expresses uncertainty about fitting the data due to the functional relationship between ##\sigma## and ##Z##.

Arne H
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The aim of a laboratory course was to measure the x-ray fluorescene spectra of 20 metallic samples. By comparison of the peaks in the energy spectra with known electronic transitions (e.g. ##K_α## of ##Cu##) the materials were identified.

After that, Moseley's law
$$ \sqrt{\frac{E}{R_y}}=(Z-\sigma_{n_1,n_2})\sqrt{1/n_1^2-1/n_2^2} $$
should be verified and the screening constant ## \sigma_{n_1,n_2} ## should be determined. The problem is, that ## \sigma_{n_1,n_2}## itself is (aside from ##n_1## and ##n_2##) a function of ##Z## (the atomic number), which means it isn't possible to just fit a linear function to the data.

Homework Equations


Moseley's law:
$$\sqrt{\frac{E}{R_y}}=(Z-\sigma_{n_1,n_2})\sqrt{1/n_1^2-1/n_2^2}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I tried to fit the data, but that does not seem to make much sense to me..

Sorry for the equations, I am new here and don't know how to properly compile LaTeX equations... :sorry:

Moderator's note: LaTex edited. See e.g. https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you plotted ##\frac{\sqrt{\frac{E}{R_y}}}{ \sqrt{1/n_1^2-1/n_2^2} }## vs. ##Z## and fitted a straight line to that? Do you see how you can extract Moseley's constant from the fit?
 
Well, the curve actually shows a linear behaviour (I assume, you mean that ## \sqrt{1/n_1^2-1/n_2^2}## is constant ##\Leftrightarrow## the data has to be fitted for every transition found (## K_\alpha ##, ## K_\beta ##, ## L_\alpha ##, etc) separately). But the problem is that ## \sigma ## seems to be also a function of ## Z ## (## \sigma < 0 ## for ## Z \geq 55## according to my course instruction)...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K