MOSFET KVL Confusion: Finding Vg | Homework Solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the gate voltage (Vg) in a PMOS transistor circuit using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between Vg, Vds, and the source voltage (Vs), which is equivalent to Vdd. The conversation highlights that without specific values for resistors R1 and R2, one can only derive expressions in terms of other variables. The consensus is that Vg can be determined as a fixed fraction of Vds, simplifying the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PMOS transistor operation
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Basic knowledge of circuit analysis techniques
  • Proficiency in Ohm's Law applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study PMOS transistor characteristics and operation
  • Learn advanced circuit analysis techniques using KVL
  • Explore the impact of varying resistor values on Vg and Vds
  • Investigate graphical methods for analyzing transistor circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing PMOS transistor circuits will benefit from this discussion.

CoolDude420
Messages
199
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


32b1b29d9f.png

b3cee60bd0.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My first attempt was to figure out what region the PMOS is operating in so that I could decide what equation to use - so I tried to find Vgs. Vgs = Vg - Vs. Vs is of course just Vdd but for Vg I did a KVL loop as below:

175cbbd244.png


My only question is. Now what do I do? How do I get rid of the I_2 in my equations for Vg??
 

Attachments

  • 32b1b29d9f.png
    32b1b29d9f.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 1,071
  • b3cee60bd0.png
    b3cee60bd0.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 1,290
  • 175cbbd244.png
    175cbbd244.png
    73.9 KB · Views: 995
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you don't know ANY of the values, you can only get expressions for any of them in terms of the others.
You can rearrange your two equations !,2 to give a formula for IR, but you could have written that down as a starting equation using Ohm's law.

Since you don't have values for R1 and R2, I think you'd be better off starting from the other end. Sketch the sort of curve you would get, then write expressions for the significant points.

If you notice Vx and VDD are in series, you could set the reference point for voltage to be the junction of drain and R2, then the source voltage just varies from VDD to zero. Vg is always a fixed fraction of Vds.
 
Merlin3189 said:
Since you don't know ANY of the values, you can only get expressions for any of them in terms of the others.
You can rearrange your two equations !,2 to give a formula for IR, but you could have written that down as a starting equation using Ohm's law.

Since you don't have values for R1 and R2, I think you'd be better off starting from the other end. Sketch the sort of curve you would get, then write expressions for the significant points.

If you notice Vx and VDD are in series, you could set the reference point for voltage to be the junction of drain and R2, then the source voltage just varies from VDD to zero. Vg is always a fixed fraction of Vds.
How exactly are Vdd and Vx in series? I mean they can form 1 loop but how are they in series if there's a transistor drain connected to Vx? I'm just quite confused. Usually KVL get's me out of situations like these.
 
You can't see they're in series, because your cct (a) is incomplete. It doesn't show where VDD comes from. I just used a cell to symbolise it and complete the cct.
The Earth point is purely arbitrary - simply a reference point for voltages. You could put it anywhere. I just wanted the complete cct to look like the diagrams in the textbooks.
mosfet.png

After you've calculated values in the righthand cct, you can change them back to the LH circuit values by simply adding Vx.

The great thing about this cct is that we can assume Ig=0, so Vg is easy to calculate.in terms of Vds. It doesn't matter what IR is. It will always be the same fraction of Vds. I just would never introduce IR into the plot. It's a red herring.

Edit: Just noticed I missed the g subscript in," we can assume Ig=0, "
 

Attachments

  • mosfet.png
    mosfet.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 1,330
Last edited:
Merlin3189 said:
You can't see they're in series, because your cct (a) is incomplete. It doesn't show where VDD comes from. I just used a cell to symbolise it and complete the cct.
The Earth point is purely arbitrary - simply a reference point for voltages. You could put it anywhere. I just wanted the complete cct to look like the diagrams in the textbooks.
View attachment 231024
After you've calculated values in the righthand cct, you can change them back to the LH circuit values by simply adding Vx.

The great thing about this cct is that we can assume I=0, so Vg is easy to calculate.in terms of Vds. It doesn't matter what IR is. It will always be the same fraction of Vds. I just would never introduce IR into the plot. It's a red herring.
Ah I see. I'll try that now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K