Motion in one dimension- total trip time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the total trip time and distance for a person driving at a constant speed of 94.0 km/h with a 22.0-minute rest stop, resulting in an average speed of 71.5 km/h. The solution involves setting up the equation v1t1 = v2(t1 + t2) and manipulating it to isolate t1. The final calculations yield a total trip time of 1.54 hours after adding the rest stop duration to the driving time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics equations in physics
  • Knowledge of average speed calculation
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
  • Familiarity with unit conversions (e.g., minutes to hours)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematics equations in one-dimensional motion
  • Learn about average speed and its implications in physics problems
  • Practice solving algebraic equations involving multiple variables
  • Explore unit conversion techniques for speed and time
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for introductory physics students, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone seeking to enhance their problem-solving skills in kinematics.

QuantumCurt
Education Advisor
Messages
726
Reaction score
166

Homework Statement



A person takes a trip, driving with a constant speed of 94.0 km/h except for a 22.0-min rest stop. The person's average speed is 71.5 km/h.
(a) How much time is spent on the trip?

(b) How far does the person travel?

This is for introductory general physics. We just finished the first chapter on motion in one dimension. We derived the kinematics equations today, but I can't seem to apply one of the standard kinematics to this. I don't know what I'm missing here.



The Attempt at a Solution



I let the total displacement equal

\Delta{x}=v_{1}t_{1} \ \ \ \ \ v_{1}=94.0km/hr

\Delta{t}=t_{1}+t_{2} \ \ \ \ \ t_{2}=22.0min \ \ \ rest \ stop

\Delta{x}=v_{2}(t_{1}+t_{2}) \ \ \ \ v_{2}=71.5km/hr \ \ average \ speed

Then I set the two \Delta{x} values equal to each other.

v_{1}t_{1}=v_{2}(t_{1}+t_{2})

Now I need to solve for t_{1}, but I can't find a way of doing so that will work. I feel like I'm making this a lot more complicated than it needs to be. Anyone have any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QuantumCurt said:
v_{1}t_{1}=v_{2}(t_{1}+t_{2})
Now I need to solve for t_{1}, but I can't find a way of doing so that will work.

Your work looks good. Try using the distributive law of multiplication to write the right hand side of your equation as ##v_{2}t_{1}+v_{2}t_{2}##.
 
TSny said:
Your work looks good. Try using the distributive law of multiplication to write the right hand side of your equation as ##v_{2}t_{1}+v_{2}t_{2}##.

I tried that before, and I seemed to hit a dead end.

t_{1}=\frac{v_{2}t_{1}+v_{2}t_{2}}{v_{1}}

Now I need to eliminate the t_{1} that's still on the right hand side, correct? I can't see any way of doing that without losing the t_{1} on the left hand side. I could multiply the whole thing by the reciprocal of the t_{1}, but that would cancel it on the left hand side, and then I'd still have it in the denominator in the right hand side, which would lead me back to exactly where I'm at now.
 
Perhaps a slightly different approach to the equations will help. If you let T be the total time for the trip, and R the time spent resting, then can you write two equations for the total distance traveled, one using the driving speed and one using the average speed?
 
I suggest a different approach to the equations like gneill, too. But the only thing to consider is what really is the value of the average speed. I say this because it is very important not losing sight of the goal when you handle the equations.
 
Last edited:
If you want to stick with your original approach, you have ##v_1t_1 = v_2t_1+v_2t_2##

You already know the value of ##t_2##. So, as you say, you only need to find ##t_1##. You have two terms in the equation with ##t_1##. Can you get those two terms on the same side of the equation?

It's going to be like solving ##5x = 2x + 6##.

Of course, you can take a different approach like gneill and LeonhardEu suggest if you want. But I think you're already close to the answer.
 
Can I treat the v_{2} and v_{1} as being coefficients, like this?


v_{1}t_{1}=v_{2}t_{1}+v_{2}t_{2}

Then subtract the v_{2}t_{1}

(v_{1}-v_{2})t_{1}=v_{2}t_{2}

Then divide to get-

t_{1}=\frac{v_{2}t_{2}}{v_{1}-v_{2}}

Then solve to get-

t_{1}=\frac{(71.5 \ km/hr)(22.0 \ min)(\frac{1 \ hr}{60 \ min})}{(94.0 \ km/hr-71.5 \ km/hr)}

To get 1.17 hours total time spent on the trip?

edit-No, that wouldn't be total time. I'd need to add the 22.0 min at the rest stop for total time, right? That would give me a total time of 1.54 hours.
 
Last edited:
Yes. That's right. Good work.
 
TSny said:
Yes. That's right. Good work.


Awesome, thanks for the help! I didn't think of the fact that I could basically treat the velocities as being coefficients of the time. That seems a lot more clear now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K