Motion under variable acceleration experiment

Click For Summary
The experiment involved examining motion under variable acceleration using a mass attached to a dynamic cart via a pulley. An unexpected decrease in calculated friction force with increased mass raised questions, as friction typically increases with mass. Suggestions included ensuring accurate measurement of acceleration and considering the effects of friction in the pulley. The discussion emphasized the importance of plotting data to identify trends and potential systematic errors in the experiment. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately calculating the friction coefficient and interpreting results.
bubblegumandcameras
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Used a mass attached to a dynamic cart via pulley to examine motion under variable acceleration. As the mass was increased, my calculated friction force shows a decrease. I know that friction should increase with larger mass. Any suggestions as to why my calculations show a decrease? Used the equation Fk= mg-Mta where Mt= total mass of system, m=mass added to end of pulley, a=experimental acceleration
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
It looks like you were examining motion with variable mass - did the acceleration vary during each test run?
Did you change the mass of the cart or the mass on the end of the pulley or both (explain)?
How did you measure the acceleration?
How did you derive the equation you used?
(What assumptions did you use?)
 
Last edited:
Out of curiosity I took some guesses:
Normally you would model friction as ##f=\mu mg## for the cart ... is there friction in the pulley too?

m=mass of trolley, M=total mass, then hanging mass is M-m > m (##\mu## needs to be measured.)

Free body diagrams for trolley accelerated by hanging mass.
(1) ##T-\mu mg = ma## for the cart
(2) ##(M-m)g - T = (M-m)a## for the hanging mass

Solve for ##a##:
(3) ##a = g - (1+\mu) mg/M##

experiment:
- change mass by taking weights off the trolley and adding them to the hanging mass - so M is a constant.
- measure the acceleration (time T over a fixed distance d ##a=2d/T^2##)
expect the plot of ##a## vs ##m## will be a straight line with slope ##s=-g(1+\mu)/M## and intercept ##g##
(does this sound like what you did?)

This allows us to calculate the friction coefficient from the measured slope.

If ##f## decreases with ##m##, then ##\mu## decreases with ##m## a lot.
This will change the shape of the graph - so: plot your data - is the graph a reasonable straight line?

If not, then what sort of curve is it?
Are there systematic errors in your experiment?
ie. the above calculation neglects friction and mass in the pulley... was this a good idea?
 
  • Like
Likes bsheikho
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
659
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K