Moving block on a moving incline

  • Thread starter Thread starter Living_Dog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Incline
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of analyzing a block on a moving incline, particularly when the incline itself is on a frictionless surface. The initial conditions can be solved using Newton's laws for both friction and no-friction scenarios, but complications arise when the incline moves. The block's acceleration relative to the incline must be considered, leading to a net acceleration that affects the forces acting on both the block and the incline. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free body diagrams (FBDs) to visualize the forces involved. Overall, the thread seeks collaborative problem-solving rather than straightforward answers.
Living_Dog
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I have thought and thought about this problem for years and made no progress.

First off, the moving block on an incline plane has a simple solution using Newton's laws for both friction and no friction cases. But once the incline plane itself is allowed to move, on a frictionless surface, then my problem begins.

Now what I am asking for is someone to help me work through the solution rather than just handing me an answer. This is not for any homework. I saw it years ago (Taylor? Goldstein??) and have never thought of posting it here until now.


Thanks!

-LD
________________________________________
my bread: http://www.joesbread.com/
my faith: http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the incline have acceleration f, which for simplicity is parallel to the ground.

Now let the block have acceleration a relative to the incline. Note that this will be parallel to the slope of the incline.

However, the total acceleration of the block will be f+a. What this means is that the block will in fact accelerate into the plane of incline, so the component of its weight on the incline, minus the inclines reaction force will be nonzero. In other words, the reaction from the incline will not entirely cancel out the component of weight.

Note that the incline will have two forces on it. It's weight, and the reaction force from the block.

Now, draw a picture.
 
Draw two separate FBD's.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top