Moving metal object in a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A bullet flying near a magnet experiences a change in trajectory due to the magnetic force, which requires energy. This energy is derived from the Earth's motion, as the magnet, when bolted to the Earth, exerts a force that slightly alters the Earth's position. The change in trajectory is analogous to a ferrous ball being attracted to a magnet on a table, where the Earth's force affects both objects. The energy transfer involved is minimal due to the Earth's massive size compared to the bullet. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the interplay of forces and energy in magnetic interactions.
alikim
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a bullet flying by a magnet, the magnet will attract the bullet and change its trajectory so it will turn slightly. Does that trajectory change take energy? If it does, where does it come from? The kinetic energy of the bullet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just like gravity, the attractive force acts on both objects. So if the magnet attracts the bullet with a force, the magnetic force is also pulling on the magnet. If the magnet is bolted to the earth, then the Earth's motion may change slightly. But since the Earth is much more massive than the bullet, the change will be barely noticed.

I don't know if you are assuming that the bullet is made of a magnetic material. It could be something like copper, but you can still have it affected by the magnet, due to the conductor's motion in a magnetic field. See Lenz's Law.
 
I understand that there are forces at play there. I'm asking about energy, see my OP.
 
scottdave said:
If the magnet is bolted to the earth, then the Earth's motion may change slightly. But since the Earth is much more massive than the bullet, the change will be barely noticed.
alikim said:
I understand that there are forces at play there. I'm asking about energy, see my OP.
He did answer your question. In the first case the energy comes from the Earth. There is a force applied through a small distance (the change in the Earth's position and/or rotation), which is equivalent to the work done to change the trajectory of the bullet.

It's the same as when you bolt a magnet to a table and place a ferrous ball nearby. The ball is pulled to the magnet because the Earth is exerting a force on the magnet which changes the Earth's motion imperceptibly.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top