Moving solar panel produce more power than a stationary one

AI Thread Summary
Moving photovoltaic materials towards a light source can potentially increase the induced electromotive force (emf) due to a higher intensity of photons. This motion could lead to a blue shift in the light, increasing the energy of each photon. However, it remains uncertain whether this movement results in a greater or lesser number of photons per second reaching the solar cell. Some solar panels are designed to track the sun to optimize energy capture. The discussion raises questions about the implications of motion on photon intensity and energy without violating relativity.
nuhdimgmai
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let us have a photo-voltaic circuit. The amount of emf induced in the photo-voltaic material is in direct proportion to the amount of photons(intensity) falling at it. Hence if we move the photo-voltaic material in a direction towards the source of the light, it must generate an increased emf owing to the increased photon intensity due to the relative motion to the photon with respect to the solar cell? Or is this a violation of theory of relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so. Relativistic effects would cause time dilation, but also cause the light to be blue shifted. So you would see each photon have more energy, but I don't know if you would see MORE photons per second or LESS.
 
nuhdimgmai said:
Let us have a photo-voltaic circuit. The amount of emf induced in the photo-voltaic material is in direct proportion to the amount of photons(intensity) falling at it. Hence if we move the photo-voltaic material in a direction towards the source of the light, it must generate an increased emf owing to the increased photon...

...the increased number of photons. Yes. Stop there, the rest makes no sense. There are indeed solar panels that are programmed to face the sun.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top