Multi-line Equation Problem in Latex

  • Context: LaTeX 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around formatting multi-line equations in LaTeX, specifically how to align parts of an equation such that certain terms appear directly beneath specific operators, like the '+' sign, rather than beneath the '=' sign. Participants explore various environments and commands within LaTeX to achieve this formatting.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a method to split a long term in an equation so that the second half aligns under the '+' sign.
  • Another suggests using the "align*" environment for easier formatting of multi-line equations.
  • Some participants mention the use of AMSLaTeX macros and provide links to guides for further reference.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of using nested split environments and how alignment characters affect the layout of equations.
  • One participant provides an example of using ampersands for alignment within a split environment, but notes issues with multiple alignment tabs in certain math packages.
  • Another participant shares a method for defining new commands to facilitate spacing and alignment in complex equations.
  • There is a query about numbering multi-line equations with subindices, leading to a suggestion of using the subequations environment from the amsmath package.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and preferences for formatting equations, but no consensus is reached on a single best approach. Some methods are confirmed to work, while others are debated regarding their effectiveness and compatibility with different LaTeX packages.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the use of alignment characters and the behavior of nested environments, which may vary depending on the LaTeX packages used.

  • #31
yes,i 've figured that now. thanks though for your advise. i really2 appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K