Multiple delta solutions in limit proof

In summary, the number of delta solutions for epsilon/delta proofs of a limit depends on the point at which the limit is taken. The definition of continuity can also affect the number of delta solutions, with a stronger definition requiring a single delta to work for all points. The concept of uniform continuity involves finding a delta that works for all points simultaneously. As for finding a delta at an asymptote, it may not always be possible due to the nature of the function.
  • #1
Shaybay92
124
0
Just wondering why there can be more than one delta solution for epsilon/delta proofs of a limit. I mean, shouldn't there just be one delta that can be used at any point on the function? Why is it that there is more than one and you choose the minimum delta..? I saw a geometric representation of why you would choose the minimum (if part of the function was near an asymptote) but can't you find one so that even at the asymptote it will be within epsilon? I hope I am making sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First of all, different proofs may use different delta's, but at any point there is a maximum delta, say [itex]\delta_0[/itex], such that
[itex]|x - a| < \delta \implies |f(x) - L| < \epsilon[/itex] if and only if [itex]\delta < \delta_0[/itex]. But since the definition only states that there exists some delta, it is not necessary to find this bound (i.e. if you find a smaller delta than absolutely necessary, you can still prove the limit).

Or were you asking: why is it possible that the delta we need depends on the point in which we are taking the limit? In that case, you might want to read up about different forms of continuity. For example, we say that a function is continuous at a, if
[tex]\forall \epsilon, \forall a, \exists \delta = \delta(a): |x - a| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon[/tex]
and then a function is continuous if it is continuous at all a (that is for all a and all epsilon we can find a delta which works for that epsilon and that a).
We can also require that
[tex]\forall \epsilon, \exists \delta, \forall a, |x - a| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon[/tex]
That is, for all epsilon we can find a single delta which works for that epsilon, but for all a. Obviously, this is a stronger statement. For example, even if you can find a delta which depends on a, it may be possible that the minimum (or infimum) over all these deltas is zero. In that case the function is continuous, but you still cannot find a delta which works for all points at once.
If such a delta does exist, we say that the function is uniformly continuous.

About the question about the asymptote, it is not quite clear to me what you mean here. Do you mean: why can't we find a delta around, for example, x = 0 for f(x) = 1/x?
 

1. What is a multiple delta solution in limit proof?

A multiple delta solution in limit proof refers to the use of multiple values for the delta variable in order to prove the existence of a limit. This approach is often used when the traditional method of using a single delta value fails to prove the limit.

2. Why is a multiple delta solution needed in limit proof?

A multiple delta solution may be needed in limit proof when the traditional method using a single delta value is not sufficient to prove the limit. This can occur when the function or sequence being evaluated is particularly complex or has multiple discontinuities.

3. How is a multiple delta solution used in limit proof?

In a multiple delta solution, different values for the delta variable are chosen and tested to see if they satisfy the definition of a limit. If one or more of these values is successful, the limit is proven. If none of the values work, it may be necessary to use a different approach or additional mathematical techniques.

4. What are the advantages of using a multiple delta solution in limit proof?

The main advantage of using a multiple delta solution in limit proof is that it allows for a more flexible and thorough approach to proving the limit. By testing multiple values for the delta variable, a more complete understanding of the behavior of the function or sequence can be achieved. This can also help to identify any potential issues or limitations in the traditional method.

5. Are there any limitations to using a multiple delta solution in limit proof?

While a multiple delta solution can be a useful tool in limit proof, it is not always necessary or appropriate. In some cases, a simpler or more direct approach may be more effective. Additionally, the use of multiple delta values can be time-consuming and may not always provide a definitive answer. It is important to carefully consider the specific problem at hand before deciding to use a multiple delta solution in limit proof.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
858
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
Back
Top