Multiple Integrals for Functions Unbounded at Isolated Points

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on defining multiple integrals for functions that are unbounded at isolated points. The approach involves removing spheres around each discontinuity and evaluating the limit of the integral as the radius δ approaches zero. For functions with multiple undefined points, the integral can be split into segments, such as (a, δ1), (δ1, δ2), (δ2, δ3), and so forth, with each δ approaching zero. This method allows for a systematic treatment of each discontinuity in the region of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multiple integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with limits and continuity concepts
  • Knowledge of handling discontinuities in functions
  • Basic notation for integrals and regions of integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of improper integrals in calculus
  • Learn about Lebesgue integration for handling discontinuities
  • Explore the use of limits in defining integrals with singularities
  • Investigate the theory behind piecewise functions and their integration
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in advanced calculus, mathematicians dealing with integrals, and anyone interested in the rigorous treatment of functions with discontinuities.

silvershadow7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a recent homework assignment, I was asked to prodive a definition for ∫f(x) in the Region D, provided there was a discontinuity somewhere in the region. To define the integral, we merely removed a sphere centered on the discontinuity of radius δ>0 and found the limit of the integral as δ→0.

My question is how would you provide a more generalized definition for a function that had multiple undefined points? if i had points (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) where the function was undefined.

Would I somehow split the integral up into three parts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever trick you used can be used separately at each point in question. You would need a more sophisticated approach if there are an infinite number of points involved.
 
but if the integral originally broke up the bounds to be one integral with (a, δ) and the second integal with(δ,b), with δ going to zero after the integral was evaluated, then how would the bounds look with more points??

(a,δ1) , (δ1,δ2), (δ2,δ3), ...etc (δn, b) ??

with each of those δ, going to zero??
 
Your notation is very confusing. The general idea is to treat each discontinuity separately.

You use a, b, various δ's, without defining anything.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K