Find the multiple integral for a modeled problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bee flying from a light pole to a picnic blanket, requiring the setup of a multiple integral to represent the average length of all possible paths. The context includes geometric considerations of a light pole and a rectangular area on the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the suitability of spherical versus Cartesian coordinates for setting up the integral. There are attempts to define bounds for the integration and questions about how to account for the shape of the area of integration.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different coordinate systems and their implications for the problem. Some have provided insights into the integration process, while others express confusion about the volume of integration and the nature of the integrand. There is an ongoing dialogue about the correct approach without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the bounds of integration and the shape of the region being considered. Participants are also questioning assumptions about the integration limits and the nature of the paths being integrated.

xipe
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 12 foot light pole stands at the corner of an 8 foot by 10 foot rectangular picnic blanket spread out on the ground. A bee flies in a straight line from a point P on the pole to a point Q on the blanket.

Set up a multiple integral whose value represents the average length of all possible paths along which the bee could fly.

Homework Equations


None so far.

The Attempt at a Solution


After sketching the situation, I think spherical coordinates would be best to use, but I am having trouble figuring out the bounds. I think that rho would go from sqrt(12^2+8^2) to sqrt(12^2+10^2+8^2), these being the shortest and longest length of rho from the top of the pole to the corners of the blanket. This would only give half of the region of the blanket though. If i could find an integral and multiply it by 2, it should work. If this were the case, theta would go from 0 to pi/2. My main issue would be finding the values for phi. I would imagine it would go from (pi/2)+tan^-1(12/sqrt(10^2+8^2) to pi. My other concern is that maybe rho has to be a function of phi somehow. Sorry for the confusing description, but this problem is giving me a lot of issues. Any advice to point me in the right direction would be immensely appreciated! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xipe said:
After sketching the situation, I think spherical coordinates would be best to use

Hi xipe,
why do you think that ? Suppose I would think Cartesian coordinates were the best, how would you weigh our mututal proposals ?
 
I can't see how spherical coordinates will help here. Quite the opposite!
 
So if I used Cartesian coords, would it just be 0<=x<=8,0<=y<=10,0<=z<=slope of the hypotenuse from the top of the pole to out outskirts of the blanket? My difficulty is accounting for the shape of the area of integration.
 
xipe said:
So if I used Cartesian coords, would it just be 0<=x<=8,0<=y<=10,0<=z<=slope of the hypotenuse from the top of the pole to out outskirts of the blanket? My difficulty is accounting for the shape of the area of integration.

If the bee flies from (0,0,z) to (x,y,0) you do not need any restrictions on the slope of the hypotenuse. The only restrictions are 0 ≤ z ≤ 12, 0 ≤ x ≤ 8 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 10.
 
That's what I thought originally, but wouldn't that give you a cubic volume when you integrate it? I'm missing something, otherwise the integrand should just be dxdydz?
And to find the average value, the volume of the region of integration is another confusing thing to figure out.
 
Does that give you a length ?
Draw the line from (0,0,z) to (x,y,0) and write an expression for the length ...
 
Would that length be sqrt(z^2+sqrt(x^2+y^2))?
I apologize for all of the questions and greatly appreciate all of your help.
 
xipe said:
Would that length be sqrt(z^2+sqrt(x^2+y^2))?
I apologize for all of the questions and greatly appreciate all of your help.
You don't need that second square root. Just use the distance in Cartesian coordinates.
 
  • #10
xipe said:
That's what I thought originally, but wouldn't that give you a cubic volume when you integrate it? I'm missing something, otherwise the integrand should just be dxdydz?
And to find the average value, the volume of the region of integration is another confusing thing to figure out.

The integration element is just ##dx\, dy \, dz##, but the integration region is not a rectangular box; you are not looking at a solid region where a little ##dx\, dy## cylinder segment goes from ##(x,y,0)## to ##(x,y,z_{\max}(x,y))##, and you most definitely are not evaluating the volume of a solid region.

If I were doing the problem I would do the ##xy##-integration first, for fixed ##z##, then integrate over ##z## after that.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K