Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Multiplication and Addition to get an integer

  1. Jun 15, 2017 #1
    Hi, to understand finally the Laue equation for diffraction I am missing something :

    h*p+k*q+l*r = integer. Given that p,q,r are integers how come h,k,l MUST BE INTEGERS as well?

    Say p=q=r=2, than h=k=l=1/2 works just fine. I understand that there is something about a common multiplier, but what I really want to see is a SOLID MATHEMATICAL proof to that statement. I am not a mathematician but an engineer and have no clue there to start to look for such a proof . . .

    help?


    Thank you,

    Anton
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 15, 2017 #2
    I did a little reading about this subject. I need to do more to understand all of what is going on, but maybe it has to do with what these numbers represent (something in the crystal structure) rather than what is mathematically possible.
     
  4. Jun 15, 2017 #3
    Well, these are very important numbers (h,k,l), true. But we start without restrictions, only then we get the condition for constructive interference:

    h*p+k*q+l*r = integer (or more precisely h*p+k*q+l*r = integer*2*pi) knowing that p,q,r are integers. From here it is pure mathematics (THE PART I AM MISSING)
    to show that h,k,l MUST BE INTEGERS to fulfill this condition and once they are, only THEN they will become IMPORTANT and gain more meaning.
     
  5. Jun 15, 2017 #4
    Well, this question was moved from the General Math forum here. Reason: "Physics question, mathematically they could be fractions".

    I keep insisting that NOT, this is a MATHEMATICS question, simple as that. If mathematicaly they could be fractions, the there is
    something very wrong with the physics :)

    AGAIN: Proof that for the statement h*p+k*q+l*r = integer then p,q,r are integers to be true, we MUST HAVE h,k,l =INTEGERS.

    MATHEMATICS!
     
  6. Jun 16, 2017 #5

    f95toli

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This all has to do with physics; not maths (mathematically they could be anything, and this should be fairly obvious).

    The equation gives you a condition(relation for when the phases of the incoming and outgoing waves coincide. Hence, we get this result because we are working with (periodic) waves; there is no way to derive this equation without keeping in mind what it represents.

    Have you looked at the wiki for the Laue equation? Is there something in the derivation you do not understand?
     
  7. Jun 16, 2017 #6
    Can you post a link for that derivation? Or maybe to the source?
    In the derivations I know, this condition does not come up at all.
     
  8. Jun 17, 2017 #7
    Hi watch this

    for example. It comes up always. Start from 16:30 and pay special attention to 18:55.

    I WILL SAY AGAIN: We find the vector (S-S0)/lambda, this has units of 1/length and ONLY THEN WE EXPRESS IT as a vector in the reciprocal space.
    Then we WRITE THE CONDITION FOR CONSTRUCTIVE interference and ONLY THEN WE CONCLUDE THAT h,kl are integers FOR THAT CONDITION TO BE TRUE.

    I understand the derivation perfectly but this MATHEMATICAL statement I CANNOT PROOVE.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Multiplication and Addition to get an integer
  1. Get into the wall (Replies: 2)

Loading...