Okay, I am not sure if this is the right subforum, but here goes:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

An einstein solid is a solid composed of N quantum harmonic oscillators, which can store evenly spaced energy units q.

Now suppose we have an einstein solid of N oscillators with q energy units, where q>>N. My book wants to derive an expression for the multiplicity of this solid, but I can't quite follow the approximations leading to the final expression:

We have in general that that the multiplicity, Ω, of an einstein solid is given by the binomial:

Ω = C(q+N-1,q) , where C() is the binomial coefficient. I wont verify this expression, because it is the approximations of it that bother me:

In general we have from the definition of the binomial coefficient:

Ω = C(q+N-1,q) = (q+N-1)!/((N-1)!*q!)

My book approximates this to:

Ω = (q+N)!/(q!*N!)

with the argument that:"The ratio of N! to (N-1)! is only a large factor (N).

I dont see what this has to do with the approximation. The multiplicity above gets far bigger with the approximation because it all depends on q.

For instance, say q=100 and N=2. Then you get:

Ωreal = 101!/100! = 101

Ωapprox = 102!/2! ≈ 50*Ωreal

or i general for N=2:

Ωapprox = q/2 * Ωapprox

So in general how is this approximation valid? Am I plugging the numbers in the wrong way?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Multiplicity of an einstein solid

Loading...

Similar Threads - Multiplicity einstein solid | Date |
---|---|

B Practical use of Bose-Einstein condensate? | Feb 1, 2018 |

A Multiplication and Addition to get an integer | Jun 15, 2017 |

Does each band have multiple allowed E-values for th same k? | Feb 13, 2015 |

Generalising the Ising model to multiple spin values | Nov 16, 2014 |

Random nature of multiple scattering | Aug 7, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**