Multivariable calculus: find the rate of change

Click For Summary
To find the rate of change in temperature of the metal plate, the gradient vector of the function T(x, y) = x sin y + y² sin x must be calculated. The directional derivatives for the positive x-axis and y-axis at the point (π, π) correspond to the x and y components of the gradient, respectively. A unit vector is not strictly necessary for this calculation since the directional derivatives can be directly derived from the gradient components. The discussion confirms that the rates of change in the specified directions can be obtained simply by evaluating the gradient at the given point. This approach effectively simplifies the problem to finding the partial derivatives with respect to x and y.
reminiscent
Messages
131
Reaction score
2
Missing homework template due to originally being posted in other forum.
The problem is:
The temperature (in degrees Celsius) of a metal plate, located in the xy -plane, at any point (x, y ) is given by the function of two variables T(x, y ) = x sin y + y2 sin x.
(a) Find the rate of change in temperature in the direction of the positive x-axis at the point (π, π).
(b) Find the rate of change in temperature in the direction of the positive y -axis at the point (π, π).

I am thinking that you would have to find the gradient vector of T(x,y), then plug the point (π, π). But the phrase "direction of the positive x-axis/y-axis at the point" is throwing me off. Does that mean you would have to find the directional derivative instead? So find the gradient vector then multiply it by a unit vector, but what is the unit vector?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org

Homework Statement


The temperature (in degrees Celsius) of a metal plate, located in the xy -plane, at any point (x, y ) is given by the function of two variables T(x, y ) = xsiny + y2sin x.
(a) Find the rate of change in temperature in the direction of the positive x-axis at the point (π, π).
(b) Find the rate of change in temperature in the direction of the positive y -axis at the point (π, π).

Homework Equations


∇T = <tx, ty>

The Attempt at a Solution


I am thinking that you would have to find the gradient vector of T(x,y), then plug the point (π, π). But the phrase "direction of the positive x-axis/y-axis at the point" is throwing me off. Does that mean you would have to find the directional derivative instead? So find the gradient vector then multiply it by a unit vector, but what is the unit vector?

Thanks.
 
The gradient of the scalar T(x,y) is given by
∇T = <tx, ty> = <(∂T/∂x), (∂T/∂y)>
Here (∂T/∂x) represents the directional derivative of T w.r.t x
and (∂T/∂y) represents the directional derivative of T w.r.t y
The Directional derivative means rate of change of a quantity in a particular direction, so you can find gradient of T and need not to multiply by any unit vector, because it won't represent the true rate of change then(as its magnitude will be 1 then)
Hope this helps
 
Yes, you're right, you need to find the directional derivative. You want the change in the x-direction, so what would be the unit vector in this direction?
 
Aniruddha@94 said:
Yes, you're right, you need to find the directional derivative. You want the change in the x-direction, so what would be the unit vector in this direction?
Would it be <1,0>? Do I even need a unit vector for this?
 
Aakash Gupta said:
The gradient of the scalar T(x,y) is given by
∇T = <tx, ty> = <(∂T/∂x), (∂T/∂y)>
Here (∂T/∂x) represents the directional derivative of T w.r.t x
and (∂T/∂y) represents the directional derivative of T w.r.t y
The Directional derivative means rate of change of a quantity in a particular direction, so you can find gradient of T and need not to multiply by any unit vector, because it won't represent the true rate of change then(as its magnitude will be 1 then)
Hope this helps
So a) and b) are pretty much asking for the directional derivative of T w.r.t the variable, so a) is w.r.t x and b) is w.r.t y? It's that simple?
 
reminiscent said:
Would it be <1,0>? Do I even need a unit vector for this?
Yes that's the unit vector you want. Here you don't actually NEED a unit vector, since the required direction being along the x-axis you can simply take the x component of the gradient. ( but can you see that you are taking the dot product of the unit vector and the gradient vector?)
 
reminiscent said:
So a) and b) are pretty much asking for the directional derivative of T w.r.t the variable, so a) is w.r.t x and b) is w.r.t y? It's that simple?
yes!
 
Thanks guys! :D
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K