Music Musical Chills: Do You Experience Them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fuzzyfelt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Musical chills, or frisson, are linked to emotional peaks in response to music, with studies indicating that only about 37% of the general population experiences them, compared to 90% of music students. Participants in the discussion share personal experiences of chills triggered by various music genres, often noting a stronger response to classical music and specific pieces. Some individuals report that their ability to feel chills is mood-dependent and related to their focus on the music. The phenomenon is also noted to occur in response to other art forms, such as literature. Overall, the experience of musical chills varies widely among individuals, influenced by personal connections and musical knowledge.
  • #151
Danger said:
I don't consider you to be "disagreeing", not that you should be sorry about doing so anyhow. You're merely relating a different experience than ours. I can't even say for sure that it has never happened to me; it's just that I don't remember such.

Thanks, Danger, and yes there could be all sorts of explanations. It could be that I’ve been attentive to it, it may be that there are bigger variations in this experience, or we may possibly be discussing different experiences. Lisab also had said her experience results from a combination and I like that idea but wonder if a combination of factors occurred in the experiences I’ve mentioned. I don’t think it required a combination including lyrics, but may in that instance required a combination of musical or sound elements.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #152
Andre said:
I'm not sure myself, I would tend to think it could happen the first time. I do know that music that would not touch me at all during childhood, can do so now. For instance the Wolga song performed by Rudolf Shock was my dad's favorite. But at that time I had no thoughts about it. My favorite chillers then were the Pearl Fisher duet (linked to earlier by Fuzzyfelt) and the slaves chorus from Nabuccodonosor of Guiseppe Verdi.

My Grandfather would play a recording of the Pearl Fisher duet most evenings while I did my homework as a child.

Andre said:
Also if I hear unknown music devellop the way as I expect it to, I'm wondering if it's a deja vu, from something I may have heard in the past and about which I had forgotten.

brainstorm said:
Well, some people may not realize it but music does have various languages and vocabularies. So there's really no such thing as a piece of music that's totally unrecognizable. If nothing else, music usually consists of notes from a 12 interval division of octaves. If you would divide octaves into 13, 11, or some other number of equal intervals, you would probably still organize the notes into relatively consonant and dissonant harmonies. If you didn't organize them at all, and even didn't bother with any discernible rhythm, you would have a hard time distinguishing such "music" from noise. So, generally most music plays on past emotions you've experienced through or to music and evokes them in innovated ways by varying the elements in various ways.

Yes, I think you both are saying that memories could be very important, and I agree. I think Loren Booda might have been talking along these lines, too.

I"d focussed on a surprisingly good resolution as a trigger on first hearing, but wonder about music that doesn’t resolve itself as a counter to that, too. I’ve listened to Schoenberg a lot in my life, for example, and think it can give me chills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk_hkWLDdpg&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=av2XTNgA72w&feature=related Or Stockhausen can be thrilling?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13D1YY_BvWU&feature=related

So it may not necessarily be about resolution, but is music rather than noise important? I’ve recently linked this to illustrate some problems with distinctions- ‘When Indian sitar virtuoso Ravi Shankar and his ensemble played at Madison Square Garden, New York, in 1971, the audience broke into rapturous applause at the first short pause. "Thank you," said Shankar. "If you appreciate the tuning so much, I hope you will enjoy the playing more."’
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ef=online-news
And wrote more about this here once, saying I think what is considered music may be to do with aesthetic perception.
(More-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_music
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/music/ )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #153
Andre said:
...and coming to think of it, solving things like https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2334851&post2334851 certainly gives the same experience. maybe that explains my activity over there.

That is a big compliment, thank you, Andre! It strikes me often as very artistic. I worry about doing those landmarks justice- others at this forum would have better suited to providing hints for that numerical one, but it was nice to put it in an historical context, thanks. I won't get a chance to play again for a while, sadly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #154
rhody said:
Fuzzy,

Holy ... ! What you just said convinced me that I am not crazy. When I said awhile ago that I can give myself chills in thinking about some fantastic idea or a piece of music, or after stopping listening to music and imagining it. What I didn't state was that if I was feeling worry before the chill experience, it is replaced by a sense of well being that comes with the "chill" experience. The worry disappears. This is such a great thing I can't begin to describe it. I am convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt, at least for me, that my worry is a "mild" form of OCD, and the chill experience breaks the cycle of it.

as I replied to Danger in https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2820215&postcount=144"


Rhody... :biggrin:

Rhody, I enjoy your exclamations! I pleased my post was reassuring. I hope it has application, as it seems to in other instances of chills, too. I think possible factors so far have included pitch or tone (with voice, guitar, violin, piano…), beat and percussion instruments, memories, emotion (including emotional lyrics or that contained in the voice or seemingly in an instrument) and one that seemed to strike a chord (sorry for the pun) with a few of us-resolution. And on top of all of this is lisab’s mention of a combination. This has all given me a lot to think on.

A resolution to worries is very rewarding. Perhaps it is just satisfying, I don’t know. I’ve tried turning the music down as you suggested and don’t like it. Perhaps my imagination isn’t so good or I’m too impatient, but it just feels like it ruins a perfectly good moment. Again, I look forward to your elaboration of Doidge’s book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #155
I never got much of a thrill from Ravi Shankar's recordings, but my GF wanted to go see him and his group when they performed on campus, and I was in heaven from the beginning to end. Hearing that group live through a great sound-system AND seeing them from the front row (we got there real early) did the trick. Still, no chills of thrills from the recordings afterward. The live performance was great, though.
 
  • #156
The live performance sounds amazing! The front row, the music, the atmosphere!

On another note, I'm still wondering about how speeches like the Martin Luther King speech relate to all this, amongst many other things.
 
Last edited:
  • #157
From https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2798573&postcount=113"
'Moreover, the findings of studies seem to converge in suggesting the involvement of “limbic and paralimbic structures (such as amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, insula, temporal poles, ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and the cingulate cortex)” (Koelsch, 2005, p. 412) in musical emotion processing. Note that none of these structures appears to be specialized exclusively for music. However, the existence of music-specific modules for emotion processing remains a plausible hypothesis for future research (Griffiths et al., 2004).'

To address brain regions in comparison involved in female orgasm with chills, there appears to be common brain areas involved in both chills and female orgasm:

http://psychology.rutgers.edu/~brk/published051106.pdf"
Brain regions activated during orgasm included the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, amygdala, accumbens-bed nucleus of the stria terminalis-preoptic area, hippocampus, basal ganglia (especially putamen), cerebellum, and anterior cingulate, insular, parietal and frontal cortices, and lower brainstem (central gray, mesencephalic reticular formation, and NTS). We conclude that the vagus nerves provide a spinal chord-bypass pathway for vaginal-cervical sensibility and that activation of this pathway can produce analgesia and orgasm.

and my https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2817693&postcount=130"
I am going to try to dig up some valid scientific evidence for this, not just one's woman's opinion. Who knows, this woman may have wanted her 15 minutes of fame and got it.

http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2007/01/72325"

This article has some socially redeeming value so I thought I would include it, for instance, to a woman who was paralyzed from the waist down was able to have an orgasm after paralysis. The quote(s) in blue are especially touching (no pun intended).
WN: What are we learning about these non-genital orgasms?

Whipple: That they're real. We may have to reconsider what people define as orgasms, and not just have it defined in the genitals. We find that certain of the same brain areas are activated during orgasms experienced by imagery only (as during genital orgasms).

Komisaruk: It broadens our perspective on the potentialities of the body and brain. If we understand better how we can generate such pleasure from all different parts of our bodies, that increases our potential for sensory experience.

WN: Do you think there might come a time when orgasms really get detached from the genitals?

Komisaruk: It's happening right now. People have described orgasms through imagery, nose orgasms, knee orgasms. Although it sounds strange, the reports are believable. Now, people can show our book to someone who doubts it, and it can serve as a validation. Time will tell how prevalent non-genital orgasms are.

WN: You've found that even women with no feeling below the waist can have genital orgasms through genital stimulation.

Whipple: We've documented through our research that women who have complete transection -- interruption of the spinal cord -- can experience orgasms.

Komisaruk: The nerve pathway for that is via the vagus nerve, which can go directly from the cervix and uterus to the brain, passing outside the spinal cord. Women with spinal cord injuries told us that their doctors told them it was impossible to experience genital sensation, it was impossible to experience genital pleasure. They thought something was wrong with them when they experienced it, and they were troubled by it.

WN: What is the vagus nerve?

Whipple: "Vagus" means wanderer -- the nerve wanders through the body. Previously, it wasn't thought that it goes as far as the pelvic region. But our research and that of other laboratories is showing that it does in fact go to the cervix and uterus and probably the vagina. It carries the impulses from those regions, travels up through the abdomen, goes through the diaphragm, through the thorax (chest cavity), up the neck outside the spinal cord, and into the brain.

Komisaruk: Men and women have described an orgasmic experience from stimulation of the skin region around the level of the spinal cord injury. The injury creates an area of heightened sensitivity. They've told us if the right person stimulates that skin in the right way, it can produce very pleasurable sensation, including what they describe as orgasms.

We studied one such woman who had a spinal cord injury near her shoulders. She stimulated her neck with a vibrator, and she said that elicited an orgasm for her. We observed her blood pressure and heart rate, and they became elevated just as if it were a genital orgasm.

WN: Professor Whipple, you had a very emotional moment with one subject who had a spinal-cord injury.

Whipple: That particular woman had not tried any sexual stimulation, either with herself or a partner, in the two years since she had an injury. When she was in the laboratory, this woman experienced six orgasms through self-simulation. It was extremely emotional. She was crying, I was crying. She didn't think this was possible, and she was so pleased that she had volunteered to be a research subject. This had helped open up her essential pleasure again.

WN: You've both used fMRI and PET scans to monitor people while they're experiencing sexual pleasure. What have you learned from that?

Whipple: That some of the same brain areas are activated during orgasm in women with and without complete spinal cord injury, and also during orgasm from imagery alone, with no one touching their body, including the women themselves.

Komisaruk: Certain of the brain components -- the insula and cingulate cortex -- that are activated during orgasms in women are classically known to be activated during response to pain. We've seen that there is a strong inhibition of the response to pain during orgasm. What that leads us to think is there is some kind of very important interaction between the orgasmic experience and the pain experience.

Another brain component -- the nucleus accumbens -- which we see activated during orgasm in women has been shown by others to be activated by pleasure-producing drugs.

A third orgasm-activated brain component we see in women -- the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus -- produces oxytocin, which is secreted in peak amounts during orgasm in women and stimulates uterine contractions.

I dug up some credible evidence that proves that an orgasm by thought alone is possible, and that some areas of the brain are shared between chills and female orgasm. There, I feel better now.

Rhody...:cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #158
I always get chills when I hear my country's anthem
 
  • #159
RedAnsar said:
I always get chills when I hear my country's anthem

RedAnsar,

And what country would that be ?

Rhody...
 
  • #160
I don't get them as much as I used to, but still do. It usually seems to be at a particularly intense part of the music for me, and I think that it helps if the music is being played pretty loud.

This one gives me chills, particularly when it hits the intense part in 5/4 rhythm:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #161
RedAnsar said:
I always get chills when I hear my country's anthem

It would be really interesting to do in depth research into the emotional dynamics of nationalist/patriotic propaganda. I think the Nazi propagandists of the 1930s-40s did a lot in this area, although I wonder how much was objective scientific research and how much was just purely marching forward with art (punny, I know). I also wonder if it is possible to evoke so much nationalist-patriotic emotion with propaganda that it becomes uncomfortable to even the most devout supporters. Or could people just wallow in an ocean of country-love until they melt into a dreamy euphoria? Experiments to answer these kinds of questions could get really creepy though, I think.
 
  • #162
It has been bugging me that I should have pointed out Jehudi Menhuin/s (sp?) suggestion of silence in my last post, and also should have said sound rather than noise.

Thanks for the links and further thoughts here, I'll digest them.
 
  • #163
Rarely I felt shivers so strong when I took this picture of my niece this morning.

1608x9f.jpg


Of course it was a bit chilly still :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • #164
Nice effect from the lens flare! Did you foresee that, or was it a fortunate coincidence?
 
  • #165
rhody said:
RedAnsar,

And what country would that be ?

Rhody...
Colombia

but I get them with other nationalistic/patriotic songs from the US (among other countries...)

I suppose it is because patriotic songs have so much emotion in them you can feel it when they're properly played.
 
  • #166
Andre said:
Rarely I felt shivers so strong when I took this picture of my niece this morning.

1608x9f.jpg


Of course it was a bit chilly still :rolleyes:

Andre,

Great picture/timing/angle/shutter speed. That ethereal quality you captured triggered memories of late fall afternoon (red orange) light on a few female friend's hair (reddish blonde) in particular I used to hang out with in college, when the angle was just right, and the light hit their hair at just the right angle with me between the person and the light it triggered that same chill feeling, very strong.

I never understood it at the time, thought it was odd, maybe associated with a true attraction to the young lady, but it was something other than that. Indescribeable and fleeting, because body position, wind, sun position lasted for a few fleeting seconds, however it made a lasting imprint on my mind to this day.

Thanks for triggering it again, it was fun, and BTW stronger than most chill sensations I am used to, if there is such a thing. Sorry that it wasn't to your picture, but acting as a trigger point to my memories. I would say it only happened two or three times that I can think of though, usually at the end of a long walk at the end of the day.

Rhody... :approve:
 
Last edited:
  • #167
Only from amazing music. Songs that do it:

Ratatat - Cherry
Ratatat - Grape Juice City
Andy Blueman - Sea Tides
And as well as these some AMAZING orchestral music can like 'To Zanarkand', especially when I'm playing it on the piano!
 
  • #168
Thanks Rhody, I think I have pix like that you decribe from her, but I won't post it, however on facebook, she is one of my friends.

Turbo it was sort of random but I know what lens flare can do; so I did aim for it a bit

Oh and that post contains essential clues for the landmark
 
Last edited:
  • #169
Andre said:
Turbo it was sort of random but I know what lans flare can do so I did aim for it a bit

You kind of have to yes? A remarkable photo like that is not exactly a product of luck. Thank you for sharing Andre.
 
  • #170
TheStatutoryApe said:
...A remarkable photo like that is not exactly a product of luck...

Whilst the picture involved getting a horse whispering girl in an unusual dress and a horse in matching color at a preplanned place at an unusual early hour, was obviously a case of planning and the luck of cooperative weather, which is not very unusual here. But the pic was still a bit of luck, while I shot pix every few seconds while she passed, this one required spot on timing in that movement. But then again I could have repeated it, albeit that the dew in the grass would have been disturbed a second time.

You should see this one on an A3 size print.
 
  • #171
After watching this movie on cable many years ago I went out and purchased the DVD. The main reason I did so was because of this music:

(multiple chills)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #172
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #173
RedAnsar said:
Colombia

but I get them with other nationalistic/patriotic songs from the US (among other countries...)

I suppose it is because patriotic songs have so much emotion in them you can feel it when they're properly played.

You won't get it from ours. The British national anthem is an embarrassingly crap one.
 
  • #174
I’m correcting a correction, blaming poor connections, strange computers and a few cocktails. In my last post I was referring to
Yehudi Menuhin, Baron Menuhin, and his discussion with Glenn Gould, from post # 152, which wasn’t my previous post as I’d mistakenly said.

RedAnsar said:
Colombia

but I get them with other nationalistic/patriotic songs from the US (among other countries...)

I suppose it is because patriotic songs have so much emotion in them you can feel it when they're properly played.

Jamma said:
You won't get it from ours. The British national anthem is an embarrassingly crap one.

It is our royal anthem, too, btw. Thanks Jamma, for that previous (Emerson, Lake, and Palmer, 5/4) recommendation, which had a similar effect on me. I didn’t expect chills listening to it, it is less usual for me to experience them with the piano involved, and a piece I don’t know, so it was a nice surprise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L21Tg_UdL_Q&feature=related
I’d recommend our national anthem to anyone especially fond of the word “girt”.

This is the Colombian National Anthem.
I'm interested brainstorm's concerns although, wrongly or rightly, I like songs that to me seem to representative of a culture, like I like Blake’s “Jerusalem” (hymn) ( listened to a version by the same performers Jamma recommended), or “Guantanamera” from Cuba, for example. I don’t know Colombian music well, but have really enjoyed much of the rhythm, instruments and dancing of the little I’ve seen and heard, perhaps RedAsner might recommend more Colombian music.

Andre said:
Rarely I felt shivers so strong when I took this picture of my niece this morning.

1608x9f.jpg


Of course it was a bit chilly still :rolleyes:
Great photo, Andre. Thanks for thinking of this thread. Visual triggers especially interest me, as well as finding other triggers interesting. On that note, I’d thought it a bit too odd to mention before, but have been enjoying such a climate in my travels and will mention it anyway, an amount of humidity in the air gives me chills.

Nice musical selections, Caramon, TurtleMeister and mugaliens. Ratatat is familiar, but I hadn’t known the name.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #175
I just saw an ad on TV. Bravo Channel is showing a special tomorrow night called "The Musical Brain". From what I could gather (I saw only part of the ad), it investigates the neurophysiological aspects of musical appreciation.
 
  • #176
Danger said:
I just saw an ad on TV. Bravo Channel is showing a special tomorrow night called "The Musical Brain". From what I could gather (I saw only part of the ad), it investigates the neurophysiological aspects of musical appreciation.
Thanks for the "heads-up".
 
  • #177
Danger said:
I just saw an ad on TV. Bravo Channel is showing a special tomorrow night called "The Musical Brain". From what I could gather (I saw only part of the ad), it investigates the neurophysiological aspects of musical appreciation.

Belatedly, thank you very much Danger! Did anyone see it?

brainstorm said:
It would be really interesting to do in depth research into the emotional dynamics of nationalist/patriotic propaganda. I think the Nazi propagandists of the 1930s-40s did a lot in this area, although I wonder how much was objective scientific research and how much was just purely marching forward with art (punny, I know). I also wonder if it is possible to evoke so much nationalist-patriotic emotion with propaganda that it becomes uncomfortable to even the most devout supporters. Or could people just wallow in an ocean of country-love until they melt into a dreamy euphoria? Experiments to answer these kinds of questions could get really creepy though, I think.

Even more belatedly, brainstorm’s (?) post reminded me of a different book than the one linked here, by Carey, which also relates a very creepy use of patriotic music, Bruckner’s 4th being a recognised sign in this context-
“until what Spotts calls the most grotesque episode in musical history. On April 13 1945, the Berlin Philharmonic played Bruckner's Fourth, as a recognised sign that the Third Reich was reaching its own last bars. At the exits, members of the Hitler Youth handed out free cyanide capsules.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/oct/19/politics.art

The same book mentions Prof. Dunbar’s work with triggers of endorphins, such as synchronised activity, and suggests that music may be related to this.

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/6/1/106.abstract

Endorphins of grooming and gossip
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...&resnum=6&ved=0CDAQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
  • #178
This thread reminded me of a peculiar condition I've heard about called Stendhal Syndrome:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stendhal_syndrome

Stendhal syndrome ... is a psychosomatic illness that causes rapid heartbeat, dizziness, fainting, confusion and even hallucinations when an individual is exposed to art, usually when the art is particularly beautiful or a large amount of art is in a single place. The term can also be used to describe a similar reaction to a surfeit of choice in other circumstances, e.g. when confronted with immense beauty in the natural world.

No mention of chills, though.
 
  • #179
Thanks MIH! I hadn't heard of that, and is otherwise known as Florence syndrome. Luckily I studied there with no such problems. Oddly, this seems to be something to do with traveling, along with others like Jerusalem syndrome and Paris syndrome, also without mention of chills.

The mention made me look around a bit further and I found Ruben's syndrome, too.
 
  • #180
Ruben's syndrome could be food for an interesting discussion :biggrin:
 
  • #181
:biggrin: and thanks for the welcome, Andre,
I thought the syndrome should be mentioned as it seems relevant, but, like with rhody’s very helpful research in this thread, as it is a thread where I’ve asked for anecdotes, I don’t want to encourage specific disclosures.
Caveats covered, here is a link-
http://www.artnews.com/issues/article.asp?art_id=1000
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #182
haael said:
This performance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MExihLTljzk" gives me goosebumps no matter how many times I listen to it.

fuzzyfelt said:
19 affirmatives!

Make that 20... Wow, I love Pat Methany. I needed a bit of a boost from work stress these days, thanks haael, that did it for me. Funny too, ever since I stopped taking folic acid, the histamine rush has not been as strong or as easily triggered by music, ideas, etc... but this short musical arrangement did it again, very, very cool, thanks I needed that. For me this is proof positive that PF can be beneficial to your mental health. Hi, Fuzzy as well...

Rhody...:cool: :smile: :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #183
Hi Rhody!
Nice post, sorry it took a while to see. Of course I agree, it can be beneficial. Thanks! :)
 
  • #184
Yes I get chills.

Skin orgasm. :o
 
  • #185
G037H3 said:
Yes I get chills.

Skin orgasm. :o

G037H3,

Peer reviewed studies to substantiate your claim please... PF has standards...

Like these: http://www.psas.nl/content/doktoren/fulltext14102009.pdf"

Rhody... :devil: :smile: :redface:

Edit: I forgot the most important part of the post, lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #186
rhody said:
G037H3,

Peer reviewed studies to substantiate your claim please... PF has standards...

Like these: http://www.psas.nl/content/doktoren/fulltext14102009.pdf"

Rhody... :devil: :smile: :redface:

It's called frisson.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #187
I can actually make chills go down my spine voluntarily.
 
  • #188
I actually got chills today listening to a tune about Africa, waka waka, and soldiers, that sounded that it come from Shakira.

I got thinking at how life always seems to be hanging by a thread over there, and how intense everything seems to be.

Then I learned that it was actually from Shakira and it was the official FIFA tune. It drew out some of the magic, but it's still a good tune.
 
  • #189
This is why I love the bands I love.

APC, Tool, Nin, Rush, Pink Floyd, Led Zepplin, Lady Gaga, Tori Amos, etc... all of it is ear crack for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cacwntsr4Qw

First time I heard Gaga on the radio I was hooked, it's awesome with good surround or well tuned headphones.

Pretty sure I'll be unable to stop crying first time I go to a concert.
 
Last edited:
  • #190
Nice, thanks all. Voluntary chills are interesting 1MileCrash. Is that from thinking about music?
 
  • #191
Awhile ago in this thread I spoke of replacing an anxious feeling that turned to chills when exploring a new idea in my head and how the sense of worry was replaced by a sense of excitement and well being.

The other day on a long walk, beautiful, quiet, near sunset with an ocean background, alone, listening to music, not feeling up or down, I got an intense chill about an insight followed by a plan to make something happen for the first time. The anticipation :biggrin: of carrying it through and not the end result (whatever it turns out to be) did it for me. I started smiling from ear to ear, fleshing out the ideas as I continued to walk. I do find it amazing that it happened in a few seconds, I didn't see images or hear words, it just clicks, and when it does, does it ever feeeeeellllll goooood.

The smiling part also triggered a thought, one that until recently I never truly realized was true until probing deeper aspects of how our brain works. When you smile from an inner feeling of joy you use different muscles and parts of the brain than when posing with a smile, even if when in a good mood. The reason I say this is that when my daughter graduated college there was one picture, I can't describe it, there was a joy and energy to her smile that I never have seen before, but hope to see more of in the future.

Rhody...
 
  • #192
It's rare for me to get them the first time I hear a song, but it happened with this song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v_4O44sfjM
 
  • #193
Very Nice, lisab, thank you.

And thanks for your post Rhody. I think I understand what you say about a smile. Anticipation of a process can be wonderful. Smiling is a great state of mind, and an extreme, exceptional smile is magic. Nice thoughts.
 
  • #194
rhody said:
Awhile ago in this thread I spoke of replacing an anxious feeling that turned to chills when exploring a new idea in my head and how the sense of worry was replaced by a sense of excitement and well being.

The other day on a long walk, beautiful, quiet, near sunset with an ocean background, alone, listening to music, not feeling up or down, I got an intense chill about an insight followed by a plan to make something happen for the first time. The anticipation :biggrin: of carrying it through and not the end result (whatever it turns out to be) did it for me. I started smiling from ear to ear, fleshing out the ideas as I continued to walk. I do find it amazing that it happened in a few seconds, I didn't see images or hear words, it just clicks, and when it does, does it ever feeeeeellllll goooood.

The smiling part also triggered a thought, one that until recently I never truly realized was true until probing deeper aspects of how our brain works. When you smile from an inner feeling of joy you use different muscles and parts of the brain than when posing with a smile, even if when in a good mood. The reason I say this is that when my daughter graduated college there was one picture, I can't describe it, there was a joy and energy to her smile that I never have seen before, but hope to see more of in the future.

Rhody...
Nice thoughts about nice thoughts.
Just remembered this hypothesis about nice thoughts furthering nice thoughts-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_feedback_hypothesis :smile:
 
  • #195
I get it when certain notes are hit by female vocalists. It's creepy and good all at the same time.
 
  • #196
Here is a bit of http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1653240.htm" that reinforces a fake smile from a real one:
Different parts of the brain are responsible for real and fake smiles. The unconscious part of the brain is responsible for a real smile, while the conscious part of the brain creates a fake smile.

Because these real and fake smiles are controlled by different parts of the brain, different muscles are used to create them – and this can tell us whether a smile is genuine or not.
and
The most famous study in this field was conducted at Britain’s Hertfordshire University. 15,000 people were shown a series of fake and genuine smiles – to see if they could spot the difference.
and
Dr Paul Willis, Reporter: Guy Curtis, a psychologist specialising in emotions and social behaviour, explains that fake smiles are controlled by the cerebral cortex.

Dr Guy Curtis: The conscious part of the brain that’s used when you’re producing a fake smile usually only triggers the muscles in the cheeks that pull back the corners in the mouth.

Narration: Genuine smiles are generated automatically by the unconscious brain.

As well as making the mouth muscles move, the muscles that raise the cheeks also contract, making the eyes crease up.

Dr Paul Willis, Reporter: But there’s a few key features which distinguish a real smile from a fake one. In a genuine smile the fold in the fleshy part of the eye between the eyebrow and eyelid moves downwards and the corners of the eye brows dip slightly.

It seems that shown a real smile versus a fake one, men and women score about equally, in the neighborhood of 70%.

Rhody... :biggrin: and this is definitely fake...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #197
I wouldn't be surprised if Mona Lisa's smile was fake, even if it was originally genuine given how long she may have had to hold the pose and the amusing notion. It may have lost some appeal over time.
 
  • #198
This is my first post, although I've been reading the forum for a while. I thought this a nice thread to start in. So hello everyone, and ...

Musical chills. I get these. Quite often in fact, I'm lucky to have a large collection of music that I connect with on a deep level. If you are wondering, I listen to a lot of electronic music, I would say "techno" but that word means different things to different people. As an example, if you care to hear something:

FSOL - Cascade


L.S.G. - Hearts (Reworked)


Both tunes are quite dated in terms of electronic music, but I think the "vintage" sound is charming. They aren't musically amazing. They probably don't stand up very well to Beethoven but I think that's beside the point. Music doesn't have to be technically extraordinary to touch your soul, you simply have to be open to it, and I think this is the reason we all have such wildly different taste in music. What works for one may not work for another although there is obviously a lot of common ground as well.

In any case, I enjoyed reading this thread. Music is one universal language that we all share and it's beautiful when people can understand each other, even empathize without saying a word. Just a tune and a smile. It gives me faith in a humanity that I'm sometimes scared of losing faith in.

<3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #199
Rhody asked me to look into this thread because of my posts in the Synesthesia thread.

I too get musical chills. Very much so!

Just a few examples of the music that really affects me are;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7zJ0yVSSvE"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtz8TmL1j_w"

(Both which were linked to by other members early in the thread. Thanks!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xf-Lesrkuc" (You have to get through the advertisement on Youtube, unfortunately.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psuRGfAaju4" (A very recent addition to my "chills" list.)

I actually remember an incident several years ago where I was in the car by myself, Drops of Jupiter was playing on the radio and I was having a great time singing it at the top of my lungs. I got very intense chills right near the end of the first verse/pre-chorus and burst into sobbing tears! I was so glad no one was there to see me! I wasn't sad, I was just totally overwhelmed with emotion. To this day, if I sing that song, my voice will break and I'll get choked up if I don't all-out start crying.

The Fireflies song has the same effect on me, and that song only came out in the last year or so (to my knowledge).

I asked a musician friend of mine to analyze the structure of "Drops of Jupiter" and "Fireflies" and see if there was anything common to both of them that would make me react that way. Here was his synopsis.

"Ok.

They're both 'roughly' in the key of C.

If it's a normal pop/rock song. That means that the chords tend to hover around I-IV-V (1, 4, 5). Also called the Tonic, Sub-dominant and Dominant chords. Which is, in this case, C, F, G.

They both have an interesting deviation from the "standard" progressions and "idioms" i guess is the best word? The train song is the one that's harmonically more interesting (to me at least). If I had to guess, the feelings are being evoked by the departure from the normal. So, 100,000,000 songs in the key of C use a variation of... (I-IV-V or I-V-IV).

Train song starts with... |: I -- V --- IV :| repeated for the verse.. but then... on the line... "Tell me" it drops back down to the V (G in this case)... and then essentially goes through a mini-modulation where it starts acting like the song is now in the key of G instead of C. So it goes from G to D (which would normally be the V if the song were in G), so it feels right to your ear but because the song up to this point has been in the key of C, that D sounds like a foreign chord. It's not too foreign.. but what you're hearing that kind of lifts up your head and your ear is the F# in the D major chord. Because up until now in the song, every time you've heard an F note it has been part of the F major chord and it's been an F natural... not an F#. So... that half-step jump in your ear... is the "UPLIFTING" sound you're hearing... The bass line walking up helps emphasize this effect too. They then double back on you by moving the chord from a Dmajor up to an Fmajor. Which brings back the F natural (moving you away from that F# again). They get the "uplifting feel" here by using the Bass line... Normally... if you were walking up the scale from a Dmajor chord... you would go D, E, F#. But by the time we get to where the F# should be the chord has changed to an Fmajor so... instead of hitting the F# on the bass line walking up.. .you hit the F-natural. This is also unexpected and so it catches your ear by surprise. At this point, we're kind of out of our 'mini-modulation' into the key of G and BACK into the key of C.

WHERE THEY SET YOU UP TO DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN!

The only thing I can say about Fireflys (except for the odd instrumentation and very cool arpeggiation they are doing on the synths (hitting the notes of the chord in odd ways, jumping octaves, etc.) and the fact that the chord progression, while still based on the standard I-IV-V is unusual in that it is actually...

V - I - IV

So it sounds and feels very much like it's "homebase" is a little bit off from where it should be... like if you stopped the song in the middle of the verse... it would be ok... but they keep on going... the sequence timing is shifted... it feels... That's the upshot of having the Tonic (the 1) in the middle of the sequence.

However, the interesting part from your perspective is that on the line "everything is never as it seems". Right on the word "seems"... guess what they're doing?

THE SAME EXACT THING as the Train song! They briefly land you on the Dmajor chord. Which, again, is totally unexpected for a song in C. They then jump you directly back to the chord progression."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #200
Adyssa said:
This is my first post, although I've been reading the forum for a while. I thought this a nice thread to start in. So hello everyone, and ...

Musical chills. I get these. Quite often in fact, I'm lucky to have a large collection of music that I connect with on a deep level. If you are wondering, I listen to a lot of electronic music, I would say "techno" but that word means different things to different people. As an example, if you care to hear something:

FSOL - Cascade


L.S.G. - Hearts (Reworked)


Both tunes are quite dated in terms of electronic music, but I think the "vintage" sound is charming. They aren't musically amazing. They probably don't stand up very well to Beethoven but I think that's beside the point. Music doesn't have to be technically extraordinary to touch your soul, you simply have to be open to it, and I think this is the reason we all have such wildly different taste in music. What works for one may not work for another although there is obviously a lot of common ground as well.

In any case, I enjoyed reading this thread. Music is one universal language that we all share and it's beautiful when people can understand each other, even empathize without saying a word. Just a tune and a smile. It gives me faith in a humanity that I'm sometimes scared of losing faith in.

<3


Welcome, Adyssa, and thanks for your comments about this thread and for the music you linked to. I really enjoyed listening to it. I also identify with what you say about the enjoyment of qualities that can be other than the complex musicality of Beethoven, and have empathy with the empathy explained in your last paragraph. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
635
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
47K
Back
Top