Musical instruments and mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between the geometry of musical instruments and the sound they produce, exploring the necessary knowledge and skills for understanding this relationship. Participants express interest in fluid mechanics, acoustics, and the physics underlying various types of instruments, including woodwinds and brass. The conversation also touches on the integration of electronics in modern instruments and the importance of practical experience.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that fluid mechanics is essential for understanding the sound production in musical instruments, while others argue that quantum mechanics may be more relevant.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of tinkering with instruments to gain practical knowledge of sound and acoustics.
  • There is a suggestion that a background in music theory is beneficial for understanding the physics of musical instruments.
  • One participant mentions the significance of the embouchure in woodwind and brass instruments, which is often overlooked in traditional scientific discussions.
  • Several participants recommend specific texts, such as Tom Rossing's _The Physics of Musical Instruments_ and Benade's _Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics_, highlighting the need for both mathematical understanding and physical intuition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of fluid mechanics versus quantum mechanics in the context of musical acoustics. There is no consensus on the best approach to understanding the physics of musical instruments, as various perspectives and areas of focus are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions indicate a reliance on practical experience and experimentation, suggesting that theoretical knowledge alone may not suffice for a comprehensive understanding of sound production in musical instruments.

Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
Hi

I have been curious about the relationship between the geometry of a musical instrument and the sound it produces. What should I read and learn to understand this?

I know I will probably need to learn fluid mechanics, but what else? Surely fluid mechanics cannot be enough.

I already have a bachelors degree in mathematics. So, I am quite certain I know the prerequisite mathematics (multivariable calculus and analysis). Also, I have taken courses in classical mechanics, electromagnetism, statistical mechanics and quantum physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avatrin said:
Hi

I have been curious about the relationship between the geometry of a musical instrument and the sound it produces. What should I read and learn to understand this?

I know I will probably need to learn fluid mechanics, but what else? Surely fluid mechanics cannot be enough.

I already have a bachelors degree in mathematics. So, I am quite certain I know the prerequisite mathematics (multivariable calculus and analysis). Also, I have taken courses in classical mechanics, electromagnetism, statistical mechanics and quantum physics.

Not everything but just about everything is moving towards electronics. Be this guitars, pianos, drums, etc.

I've played guitar for decades and one soon becomes a mini electronics expert. Anyways, you will learn by tinkering. You can diagnose sound, etc. when you install a set of pick ups in an acoustic guitar. Perhaps then install the same pick ups in another acoustic with a different body shape, internal frame, type of wood, etc. Of course, this is self evident in electric guitars but they can be tinkered with like a hot rod engine.

Other than as a hobby and curiosity, there is a real career opportunity in this. In my city, someone who can convert a piano to electronics, adjust the sound of an electric violin, find the buzz on the strings of a Fender guitar...is really in demand. It's all physics.

Needless to say. If you don't have a background in music, learn some basic music theory. It is a necessity and it's fascinating stuff.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney
tom aaron said:
Not everything but just about everything is moving towards electronics. Be this guitars, pianos, drums, etc.

I've played guitar for decades and one soon becomes a mini electronics expert. Anyways, you will learn by tinkering. You can diagnose sound, etc. when you install a set of pick ups in an acoustic guitar. Perhaps then install the same pick ups in another acoustic with a different body shape, internal frame, type of wood, etc. Of course, this is self evident in electric guitars but they can be tinkered with like a hot rod engine.

Other than as a hobby and curiosity, there is a real career opportunity in this. In my city, someone who can convert a piano to electronics, adjust the sound of an electric violin, find the buzz on the strings of a Fender guitar...is really in demand. It's all physics.

Needless to say. If you don't have a background in music, learn some basic music theory. It is a necessity and it's fascinating stuff.
Sure, but I also would like to know how acoustic instruments work; Mostly as a fun way to get into fluid mechanics by actually using it. Also, to make weird musical instruments.

So, I am thinking mostly of the physics of woodwinds and brass instruments.
 
The resonance of musical instruments is closer to quantum mechanics than fluid mechanics.
 
Dr. Courtney said:
The resonance of musical instruments is closer to quantum mechanics than fluid mechanics.
I don't know about that. I thought acoustic instruments were about getting mechanical vibrations to produce musical tones. You know, resonance, and all that jazz.

All this discussion about QM or FM is nice, but there is already a special science which deals with these topics. It's called acoustics. That's where I would start.
 
Avatrin said:
Sure, but I also would like to know how acoustic instruments work; Mostly as a fun way to get into fluid mechanics by actually using it. Also, to make weird musical instruments.

So, I am thinking mostly of the physics of woodwinds and brass instruments.

If you don't get into electronics you will never know. You will just be the violin maker with an ear for sound. Phenomenal artisan but not a scientist.

You have to measure, experiment. I can tune an acoustic guitar and think 'that sounds about right'. But...what did I learn about the physics? If I want to learn about sound, I use an electronic tuner, watch the dials...read the specs on the pick ups on an electric guitar...tweak them...watch the dial. Feed it all it in. produce a graph...

Again, it's the physics of sound. Brass, woodwind, the triangle, grand piano, whistle. You have to have a means to measure and adjust defined increments and remesure. I do this all the time on my guitars.

There's a whole world of hundreds of guitar pedals making all types of sounds...visit a music store. Again, it's all physics.
 
Avatrin said:
Sure, but I also would like to know how acoustic instruments work; Mostly as a fun way to get into fluid mechanics by actually using it. Also, to make weird musical instruments.

So, I am thinking mostly of the physics of woodwinds and brass instruments.

The secret is to find a text written by both a scientist and a professional player- I have a couple candidates in my office, I'll post them tomorrow.

The reason it's important to have a player contribute to the text is that 'canonical' science discussions center on very simple physics- acoustic resonance in tubes, for example. The fact is that for the instrument classes you are interested in, the embouchure is *far* more critical, yet completely disregarded by most textbooks.
 
The classic book on this is Tom Rossing's _The Physics of Musical Instruments_. However, it's not just at a mathematically advanced level, it requires some physical intuition: it's not enough to know what Bessel Functions are - you'll want to know where and how they arise.
 
  • #10
Dr. Courtney said:
The resonance of musical instruments is closer to quantum mechanics than fluid mechanics.

Say which what?
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
The classic book on this is Tom Rossing's _The Physics of Musical Instruments_. However, it's not just at a mathematically advanced level, it requires some physical intuition: it's not enough to know what Bessel Functions are - you'll want to know where and how they arise.

Yep- that's it. Another good one is Benade's 'Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K