Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Mutual Electrostatic Energy Derivation.

  1. May 7, 2007 #1
    i don't quite understand the derivation of mutual electrostatic energy of two charged system:
    [tex]U_12=\frac{1}{4\pi}\intE_1(dot)E_2dV=-\frac{1}{4\pi}\intE_1(dot)\nebla\phi_2 dV= \frac{1}{4\pi}\int \phi_2(dot)\nebla(dot)E_1=\int \phi_2*\rho_1dV[/tex]
    i undersantd that we are using here: [tex] (1)=\nebla(\phiE)=E(dot)\nebla\phi+\phi*\nebla(dot)E[/tex]

    but why then (1)=0 here?

    thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 7, 2007 #2

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Your Latex is garbled. Use U_{12} for subsrcipts and \cdot instead of \dot.
    There are too m any other misprints to make sense of it.
     
  4. May 8, 2007 #3
    a correction:
    [tex]U_{12}=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int E_1 \cdot E_2 dV=-\frac{1}{4\pi}\int E_1 \cdot \nabla\phi_2 dV= \frac{1}{4\pi}\int \phi_2 \nabla \cdot E_1 \cdot da= \int \phi_2 * \rho_1 dV[/tex]
    [tex] (1)=\nabla(\phi E)=E\cdot \nabla \phi+ \phi * \nabla \cdot E[/tex]
    where E is a vector field, and phi is a potential field.
    i want to understand why in the first equations (the first line) why we get that (1)=0, i hope now the latex is better.
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Mutual Electrostatic Energy Derivation.
Loading...