My amplifier -- why did this capacitor blow in my guitar amp?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the failure of a capacitor in a guitar amplifier, specifically an electrolytic capacitor. Participants explore potential reasons for the failure, including design issues, component quality, and operational conditions. The conversation includes technical considerations related to voltage ratings, ripple current, and the effects of aging on capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the type of amplifier (tube or transistor) and the brand of the capacitor, suggesting that certain brands are known for reliability issues.
  • There are mentions of a "purple-out transient" as a possible cause of failure, though this is presented humorously and may not be a serious suggestion.
  • Participants discuss the importance of the voltage rating of the capacitor, with suggestions that it should be rated higher than the expected voltage across it.
  • One participant notes that the capacitor blew after two days of operation and had a bulge, indicating potential failure modes.
  • There is a discussion about the effects of ripple current on capacitor lifespan, with some suggesting that using a higher voltage rating can help mitigate issues related to ripple heating.
  • Some participants mention the importance of capacitor reforming for those that have been stored for a long time, suggesting a gradual application of voltage to prevent premature failure.
  • The discussion touches on the general failure rates of electrolytic capacitors and the impact of design and component selection on reliability.
  • There are suggestions to consider low ESR rated capacitors and to prefer reputable brands like Panasonic and Nichicon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses regarding the cause of the capacitor failure, with no clear consensus on a single reason. Multiple competing views on the factors contributing to capacitor failure remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential for aging and storage conditions to affect capacitor performance, while others point out that design flaws or incorrect component ratings could also be factors. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and opinions on capacitor reliability and failure mechanisms.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
I have built several guitar amps, but the last one I built burned out a capacitor, can anyone think of a reson for this? it was an eloctolytic, all is working fine now I replaced it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
wolram said:
I have built several guitar amps, but the last one I built burned out a capacitor, can anyone think of a reson for this? it was an eloctolytic, all is working fine now I replaced it.
Well, judging from your schematic and pictures, I'd say that your flux capacitor power supply had a purple-out transient. That is not uncommon, but I'm sure you know that... o0)

:smile:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Paul Colby, sophiecentaur, wolram and 4 others
berkeman said:
Well, judging from your schematic and pictures, I'd say that your flux capacitor power supply had a purple-out transient. That is not uncommon, but I'm sure you know that... o0)

:smile:

I have been trying to load the scematic, but for some reason
 
wolram said:
I have been trying to load the scematic, but for some reason

1573848232920.png


:smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, sophiecentaur and davenn
Ok I can't up load the scematic but here is the address for ithttp://www.ampmaker.com/infocentre/thread-140.html
 
p18sc01.jpg
 
Got it, it is c19 that blew in the power supply, sorry to have messed you guys around.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
wolram said:
Got it, it is c19 that blew in the power supply
wolram said:
the last one I built burned out a capacitor, can anyone think of a reson for this? it was an eloctolytic
What's the voltage rating of C19? Did it blow up at first power-up (maybe installed backwards)? Or did it fail after some amount of time? What did it look like after it failed (expanded pressure relief area on top?)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
  • #10
wolram said:
Got it, it is c19 that blew in the power supply, sorry to have messed you guys around.
it should have a rating of at least 400V as it's going to have ~ 300 - 350V across it

Is your one at least 400V ?
 
  • #11
275v RMS == 390v peak on low load.

I'd want a 500v rating for that cap.
 
  • #12
A transformer specified as 275 Vrms will actually give 5% more when there is no load on the secondary.
275 Vrms * 1.05 = 290 Vrms.

290 Vrms * 1.4142 = 410 Vpeak.
450 Vdc is the next higher voltage rated electrolytic capacitor.

The mains voltage may also be higher than expected by 5% or so.
At full power the ripple current will be higher than load current by maybe a factor of about 10.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
  • #13
davenn said:
it should have a rating of at least 400V as it's going to have ~ 300 - 350V across it

Is your one at least 400V ?

Yes it's 500v, installed the correct way and it blew after about 2 days working, the cap had a slight bulge to one side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #15
wolram said:
Yes it's 500v, installed the correct way and it blew after about 2 days working, the cap had a slight bulge to one side.

Who made it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
  • #17
If an electrolytic has been sitting on the shelf for a couple of year or more it's a good idea to connect it to a current-limited supply, and gradually ramp it up to rated voltage. Look up "capacitor reforming".

https://www.qsl.net/g3oou/reform.html gives the general idea. A number of VFD drive manufacturers publish similar procedures since a new drive might be in benchstock for years before it is called into service, and taking time to reform the DC link caps guards against premature failure (and even more down time).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Jon B, Bystander and berkeman
  • #18
Asymptotic said:
If an electrolytic has been sitting on the shelf for a couple of year or more it's a good idea to connect it to a current-limited supply, and gradually ramp it up to rated voltage. Look up "capacitor reforming".

https://www.qsl.net/g3oou/reform.html gives the general idea. A number of VFD drive manufacturers publish similar procedures since a new drive might be in benchstock for years before it is called into service, and taking time to reform the DC link caps guards against premature failure (and even more down time).
@Asymptotic that link appears to be broken.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #20
I can see it is not a Dynaco circuit. if you run high frequency too long it can over heat caps and blow them. It could be an engineering mistake. Double the cap voltage of your blown cap put a new cap in. If you ever have a Dynaco tube amp you will never want anything else.
 
  • #21
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #22
Since this horse is already lying down:
Baluncore mentioned 'Ripple Current'. That is often the straw that breaks the camel's back in electrolytic capacitors. It causes dielectric heating; ultimately raising the temperature of the capacitor and 'aging' (or 'cooking') it. I've seen many designs where a capacitor was of the correct voltage and nominal capacitance, but not rated for the ripple current heating that it would experience. Using a higher-than-required voltage rating is an imprecise (but often effective) way to survive high-ripple situations. Or, one could completely understand what is required of a part (before selecting it). This behavior is one of the most significant differences between an ideal and an actual capacitor.

edit: that's an ugly mixed metaphor, isn't it?
 
  • #23
What about a low ESR rated cap?

Electrolytics have a high failure rate in general, but a good brand makes all the difference. I like to see Panasonics and Nichicons. OP hasn’t mentioned the brand yet.
 
  • #24
Steam engines and vacuum tubes require special care for long life. Chemical cells and electrolytic capacitors are similar. They have limited lives that are extended by gentle treatment. Care for them like you would a pet or your favourite pot plant, and they will have a similar lifetime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #25
There may be nothing wrong with the design. A lot of components will fail early. That is just the nature of the timing of component failure. Failure rates have a bathtub shape.
 
  • #26
wolram said:
I have built several guitar amps, but the last one I built burned out a capacitor, can anyone think of a reson for this? it was an eloctolytic, all is working fine now I replaced it.
Electrolytics commonly fail from excess heat over time. A possibility is that the voltage rating was too low. Another is that it was leaky as manufactured, or you used a very old one. Another possibility is that a rectifier is leaky giving it AC current which causes heat. Also if the capacitor value is too low it will get hot from the ripple current. Electrolytics are polarized so if you wired it wrong that could be the reason.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K