My ballistic trajectory on the Moon looks wrong

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of calculating the trajectory of a payload launched from Tycho crater to Descartes on the Moon. The initial calculations suggest an ejection angle of 9 degrees and a release velocity of 2500 m/s, which raises concerns as it exceeds the Moon's minimum orbital velocity of approximately 1000 m/s and its escape velocity of 2380 m/s. The calculations do not account for factors such as the Moon's curvature, rotation, mass concentrations, and the effects of a tenuous atmosphere. It is noted that the distance between the two points is a significant fraction of the Moon's circumference, making the trajectory more complex than initially assumed. Suggestions for refining the calculations include considering centrifugal acceleration to adjust the effective gravitational force and exploring elliptic orbits for a more accurate solution. The ultimate goal is to understand the dynamics of the launch and the resulting explosion when the payload impacts an obstacle at the destination.
stationheister
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm writing a science fiction story and I have managed to confuse myself. I have a rail line that accelerates a train in Tycho crater and tosses a heavy payload of ore to Descartes, about 1200 km, where it's supposed to land on another ramp... or something. I've used Google Earth to estimate my distance and ejection angle, then I fudged my figures into shape using this CalcTool:

http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/Newtonian/projectile

Ejection angle: 9 degrees
Release velocity: 2500 m/s !?
g: 1.62 m/s^2

Which gives me

Max height: 49488.5 m
Distance traveled: 1192.2 km
Time taken: 482.2 s

The problem I see here is that 2500 m/s, mostly horizontal, is considerably more than the approximately 1000 m/s minimum orbital velocity of the Moon, and more than the 2380 m/s escape velocity of the Moon. It just doesn't seem right.

I'm aware that this calculation fails to account for the curvature of the Moon, its rotation, mass concentrations and the tenuous atmosphere that all these rockets would eventually create. But I had *hoped* that such considerations would not be significant enough to worry about.

(We also don't have to worry about such things because there is another railroad car parked across the tracks at the end of the ramp, and what we are really interested in is the size of the explosion it's going to create. Right now it looks... meteoric!)

I'd really appreciate some help in restructuring my calculations and helping me to understand what's going on here. Thank you in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stationheister said:
But I had *hoped* that such considerations would not be significant enough to worry about.
Your distance is a significant fraction of the circumference of the Moon, the two points are much more than 9 degrees apart. It will be relevant.

As approximation for a flat trajectory, you can calculate the centrifugal acceleration seen by the projectile, and subtract that from the gravity of Moon to get an effective gravitational attraction. Iterate until you have a solution that fits.

Alternatively, use elliptic orbits to find a solution.
 
A map of a four-dimensional planet is three dimensional, so such can exist in our Universe. I made one and posted a video to the Internet. This is all based on William Kingdon Clifford's math from the 19th century. It works like this. A 4D planet has two perpendicular planes of rotation. The intersection of such a plane with the surface of the planet is a great circle. We can define latitude as the arctan( distance from one plane/distance from the other plane). The set of all points...
Back
Top