My proof of the Geometry-Real Analysis theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion presents a proof of the Geometry-Real Analysis theorem, demonstrating that finitely many disjoint discs can be inscribed in a unit square with a total area approaching 1. The proof involves partitioning the unit square into smaller squares and analyzing the relationships between interior, boundary, and exterior squares. Key equations are derived to show that as the number of partitions increases, the supremum of the area of the disjoint unions approaches 1. The final conclusion confirms that the supremum, denoted as ##a##, equals 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of convex shapes and their properties
  • Familiarity with limits and supremum concepts in real analysis
  • Knowledge of partitioning techniques in geometry
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the limit theorem in real analysis
  • Explore the concept of packing problems in geometry
  • Investigate the properties of convex shapes and their area calculations
  • Learn about the relationship between interior, boundary, and exterior regions in geometric partitions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and geometry enthusiasts interested in the properties of convex shapes and packing problems will benefit from this discussion.

Mike400
Messages
59
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
My proof of the theorem : finitely many disjoint discs can be inscribed in a unit square with total area approaching 1
Relevant Equations
$$\dfrac{i}{n^2} + \dfrac{b}{n^2} < A + \dfrac{b}{n^2} \tag1$$
$$\text{Area of finite disc packing} = e \dfrac{a- \epsilon}{n^2} + A $$
$$\left[ 1 - A - \dfrac{b}{n^2} \right] (a- \epsilon) + A<a$$
Consider a convex shape ##S## of positive area ##A## inside the unit square. Let ##a≤1## be the supremum of all subsets of the unit square that can be obtained as disjoint union of finitely many scaled and translated copies of ##S##.

Partition the square into ##n×n## smaller squares (see picture).
There are three types of such small squares: ##e## exterior squares (white in the picture), ##i## interior squares (light red in the image) and ##b## boudary squares (blue/purple). Of course ##e+b+i=n^2##

1671786017908.png


$$\dfrac{i}{n^2} < A$$
$$\implies\dfrac{i}{n^2} + \dfrac{b}{n^2} < A + \dfrac{b}{n^2} \tag1$$

Picking a finite packing that covers ##\ge a-\epsilon##, for some ##\epsilon##, we can put a scaled-down copy of this packing into each of the ##e## "white" squares and, together with the original shape ##S##, obtain a finite packing of the unit square that covers ##e \dfrac{a- \epsilon}{n^2} + A##. By using this fact and equation ##(1)##

$$a>\text{Area of finite disc packing}
= e \dfrac{a- \epsilon}{n^2} + A$$
$$= \dfrac{e}{n^2} (a- \epsilon) + A
= \left[ 1- \left( \dfrac{i}{n^2} + \dfrac{b}{n^2} \right) \right] (a- \epsilon) + A $$
$$\geq \left[ 1- \left( A + \dfrac{b}{n^2} \right) \right] (a- \epsilon) + A$$
$$=\left[ 1 - A - \dfrac{b}{n^2} \right] (a- \epsilon) + A $$

$$\implies \left[ 1 - A - \dfrac{b}{n^2} \right] (a- \epsilon) + A<a$$

As ##n\to\infty## and ##\epsilon\to 0## the LHS converges to ##a+(1-a)A##. According to a limit theorem, this limit must be ##\le a##. Thus we conclude ##a=1##.

Thus we have shown : finitely many disjoint discs can be inscribed in a unit square with total area approaching 1.

My question : Is my proof of the theorem correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand the last step, what happened to e for example?

Edit: I reread it and get it better now. My brain failed to string together the lines correctly.

I feel like you probably need to justify why ##b/n^2\to 0##. Other than that it seems fine.

@Mike400 pinging for visibility.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K