atyy
Science Advisor
- 15,170
- 3,379
somasimple said:If you reject Cm then you reject the whole theory...
Yes, and no. I think the decrease in Cm is required to offset the increase in Rm, so that the time constant remains the same. There are no outright contradictions between what I'm saying and the standard explanations. BUT there are enough differences in emphasis that I should look at the equations carefully and see whether the apparent lack of contradiction between the two explanations is due to a real similarity in the underlying mathematics, or just due to chance. But those details are not in Koch's book.
somasimple said:I do... but I can't say anything on this site without being thunder lightened by modos.
Maybe to be careful, you should say "at least one modo (singular)".
