Mystery of Capacitance Increase with Dielectric Insertion

AI Thread Summary
Capacitance is influenced by both geometry and the permittivity of the medium between capacitor plates. Inserting a dielectric increases capacitance by altering the permittivity, which affects the electric field strength. The molecules in the dielectric material induce surface charges that enhance the ability to store charge without increasing voltage. This allows for more electrons to be pushed between the plates under the same voltage. The dielectric effectively serves as the medium where energy is stored, leading to increased capacitance.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
I thought capacitance was a function of geometry. So how come when we put in a dielectric in between a parallel plate capacitor it increases the capacitance. Is this because we can increase the E field in between without worrying about dielectric breakdown. Or does it have something to do with induced surface charges on the dielectric.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
I thought capacitance was a function of geometry. So how come when we put in a dielectric in between a parallel plate capacitor it increases the capacitance. Is this because we can increase the E field in between without worrying about dielectric breakdown. Or does it have something to do with induced surface charges on the dielectric.

Capacitance is a function of geometry and also the permittivity of the medium. The dielectric changes the permittivity. A dielectric material's molecules individual electric charge will alter the strength of the electric field between the plates. This means you can push more electrons between the plates for the same voltage if you change the dielectric, because the electric field won't be as strong. You can think of the dielectric as where the actual energy is stored.
 
Last edited:
ok , thanks for your answer.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top