Chemistry Name Molecule: 2-Butanol Naming and Diagrams for Homework Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lizzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecule
AI Thread Summary
The molecule in question is identified as 2-butanol, and the discussion revolves around understanding the reaction diagram associated with it. The arrows in the diagram indicate the reaction process, suggesting either the removal or addition of compounds. Participants clarify potential names for the resulting compounds, including 1-butene, 2-chlorobutane, 2-butanone, and 2-methoxybutane. There is also a correction regarding the presence of chlorine (Cl) instead of copper (Cu) in the reaction. Overall, the focus is on accurately naming the molecule and interpreting the reaction diagram.
Lizzy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to name the particular molecule that i am looking at and fill in the blanks with that name.

Homework Equations


Choose from:
2-methoxybutane, 3-butene, 1-butene, butanal, 2-chlorobutane, ethylmethyl ether, butylmethyl ether, or 2-butanone

The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing that I did was identify the central molecule as 2-butanol, but i am no quite sure what the arrows indicate. Whether its the removal of the compound next to the arrow or the addition of it; if someone could identify the type of diagram and nudge me in the right direction that would be fantastic!
 

Attachments

  • 1233.jpg
    1233.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 478
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is an orgo way of stating "something reacting with things written above arrow yielding".
 
Okay i get it thank you so much! so if i follow a) could be 1-betene, b) 2-chlorobutane, c) 2-butanone, d) 2-methoxybutane? please note that its not suppose to be Cu its suppose to be Cl! I am sorrry...
 
Or do i have b) and c) backwards in my previous answer?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top