Nanoparticle dragged off a layer and tunnelling to a STM tip, equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stm Tunnelling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of potentials V1 and V2 across two capacitors in series in a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) setup. The equations provided are V1 = V (C1 / (C1 + C2)) - n (e / (C1 + C2)) and V2 = V (C2 / (C1 + C2)) + n (e / (C1 + C2)), where 'n' represents the number of charges and 'e' the charge of an electron. The user seeks clarification on how to incorporate the additional terms related to charge into their calculations, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of the relationship between charge and potential in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of STM (Scanning Tunneling Microscope) principles
  • Knowledge of capacitor circuits and series configurations
  • Familiarity with electrical potential and charge relationships
  • Basic grasp of quantum tunneling effects in electronics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of charge distribution in capacitors
  • Study the effects of quantum tunneling in STM applications
  • Explore advanced circuit analysis techniques for capacitors
  • Learn about the role of electron charge in potential calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electronics, physicists working with STM technology, and anyone involved in the study of quantum mechanics and electrical engineering principles.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
Here we have a STM tip placing a potential V across a monolayer with a single electron on it. | STM (scanning tunneling microscope) Tip |
| |
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\///////////////
(((((((((((( ELECTRON ))))))))))))))
------------------------ MONOLAYER ---------------------------it takes a potential V1 to get the electron away from the atom on the layer, it takes a potential V2 to get the electron to tunnel through the gap. So in effect we have 2 capacitors in series.

the question wants V1 and V2, i.e. the potential across each 'capacitor' and gives the solution

V1 = V (C1 / C1+ C2) - n (e / C1 + C2)

V2 = V (C2 / C1+ C2) + n (e / C1 + C2)Obviously the second term of each equation is related to the charge e and the number of charges n which effect the potential. However when i treat the problem as a circuit diagram i get:

V1 = V ( C1 / (C2 + C1))
V2 = V ( C2 / (C2 + C1))

Which is correct and would be correct if this were a normal circuit, however the solutions above each have that second term in.

My question is, how do i introduce that second term? i understand why its there, but can i say there will be an additional term which relates to the number of particles and add it to my V1 and V2 terms? But one is negative? Do I just say the sum of the additional terms must be zero so haphazardly include one with a positive term and one with a negative term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
currently revising, still haven't been given the solutions back (even though I've asked for them) and it may come up in the exam :-///

it's really an electronics question with two capacitors in series, but i still can't derive the solutions given, any ideas please?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
49K