Nanotechnological Maxwell's demon?

AI Thread Summary
Nanotechnology has explored the concept of mechanically separating "cold" atoms from "hot" ones, inspired by Maxwell's demon. Previous attempts have reportedly succeeded in this separation, but the process resulted in increased entropy, thereby adhering to the second law of thermodynamics. This reinforces the principle that while separation is possible, it does not violate thermodynamic laws. The discussions highlight the ongoing interest in the intersection of nanotechnology and thermodynamic principles. Ultimately, these advancements demonstrate the complexities of manipulating atomic behavior without breaching fundamental physical laws.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Has nanotechnology had any success in mechanically separating "cold" atoms from "hot" ones, an application first dreamt up by Maxwell in the late 1800s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think a while back, they had machines to try to this. IIRC, they succeeded in doing it but in doing so, the machine created entropy which still satisfies the 2nd law of thermodynamics. So, it is still impossible to violate the 2nd law.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top