Narrowing searching parameters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter waht
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Searching for specific phrases like "game theory" on the forum can yield mixed results, as the default search function often retrieves threads containing either word separately. To narrow down search results, users can specify forums or utilize Google by entering the phrase in quotes along with "site:physicsforums.com." The forum's search capabilities are limited to certain user groups, which may restrict access to advanced searching features. For optimal results, using quotation marks is essential, while gold members have the added advantage of boolean searching. Overall, leveraging Google with precise syntax is recommended for effective searches.
waht
Messages
1,499
Reaction score
4
When I try to search for let's say "game theory," the server returns some threads with the word "game" and some with the word "theory." In between those threads, there will show up a less frequent occurrence of "game theory" which is what I would be interested in. So is there a way to narrow down the search such that threads with words "game" and "theory" written respectively will be found?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've found the search tool here to be somewhat problematic, since it does seem to pick up individual words in a string rather than the entire string.

One way to way to narrow a search is to go to a particular forum to limit the search range.

https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=78 (Set Theory, Logic & Statistics)

I'm not sure of the syntax, so I tried game+theory and game AND theory. The first approach just found individual incidences of game and theory, while that latter found those as well as the string.

One way to search PF is use Google with "Physicforums" first, followed by words or exact string, e.g. "game theory".

IIRC, Greg posted something about the search function around here somewhere, but I can't recall where off the top of my head.
 
Astronuc said:
I'm not sure of the syntax, so I tried game+theory and game AND theory. The first approach just found individual incidences of game and theory, while that latter found those as well as the string.
You would have got the correct hits if you used quotation marks: "game theory".

However, this particular search capability is restricted to certain usergroups: Admins, Mentors, Science Advisors and Homework Helpers. I would have expected that Contributors also be included, but from waht's post, I'm guessing they are not.

Waht, your best option then is to use Google with the following search phrase: "game theory" site:physicsforums.com
 
Otherwise, you can always try a Google search on
"game theory" site:physicsforums.com
 
It works great with the quotation marks, that's for clarifying the syntax. PF returned right on matches on "game theory." :smile:
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top