NASA's Stance on Warp Drive: Could FTL Travel Be Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KilltheElite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nasa
KilltheElite
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
While on NASA Glen research website this morning I came across their page about warp drive. In the first few lines they say they are not sure if faster than light travel is possible. Not sure? So does that mean NASA thinks it may not be impossible to travel fater than light either then.

I was under the impression it was absolutley impossible for humans to travel faster than light and will never be possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you give us a link to the page you saw, please? This will enable up to be clear on what they are saying, and to ensure that your question is answered correctly.
 
Aye it is http://www.nasa.gov/lb/centers/glenn/research/warp/warpstat.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They say it themselves : Maturity (?)
:smile:
Well, it has been published in The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity (Class.Quant.Grav. 11 (1994) L73-L77)
and you get something like http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/12/Star_Trek_Warp_Field.png

But the key is that you need large amounts of negative energy density. If you can do that, indeed you violate the energy conditions of Hawking and Penrose.
I was under the impression it was absolutley impossible for humans to travel faster than light and will never be possible.
It is still impossible to travel faster than light locally. In this speculation, you need to create a bubble around you, traveling with you, within which you are at rest (thus saving the day for the matter your spacecraft is made up of, which is bound by electromagnetism as pointed out in the text you linked). It would be kind of similar to what happens when a boat travels fast on water : it creates a wave because it drags water around itself (this analogy has strong limitations however). This example is intended to show that there is no magic : if you really were to do that, it is expected that you will loose huge amounts of energy by gravitational waves. So even accepting the idea that you can create such negative energy density regions around your spacecraft , you will still need to find a way to make them stable, and this might require too much energy anyway.

I think the two things you should rememer :
  • speculation
  • locally, you still do not travel faster than light. This has never been challenged I think
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top