Difference Between Natario & Alcubierre Warp Drives

JonnyMaddox
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
There are two solutions to Einstein's equations that allow for warp drive. One is the Alcubierre warp drive and the other is the Natario warp drive.

What is the difference? Is the Natario warp drive better suited for a real life application than the Alcubierre warp drive? Here is a paper in which something of this is explained I think. Sadly I know too little about this to understand it. Maybe someone who understands this can write an answer to my questions :)

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00844801/document
(btw, they agree with White)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you posted this on another site too:

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/147447/natario-warp-drive

Warp drives are speculative science right now as they depend on exotic matter to warp spacetime which is something we don't even know exists.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They are all
JonnyMaddox said:
Is the Natario warp drive better suited for a real life application than the Alcubierre warp drive?
Here is a better reference for the Natario spacetime:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0110086

It is essentially just a generalization of the Alcubierre spacetime. Natario proves that any warp drive spacetime will have negative energy density, so that means that none of them are suited for real-life application at present or in the forseeable future.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top