Natural Circulation and Decay Heat

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating core temperature differences (ΔT) and natural circulation flow rates in a theoretical nuclear plant shutdown scenario. The initial decay heat percentages and corresponding ΔT values are provided, with the goal of determining final values using established equations. Key equations include ΔT1/ΔT2=Q1(2/3)/Q2(2/3) for power and temperature, and ΔT1/ΔT2=m12/m22 for natural circulation flow rates. The discussion references practical applications in nuclear regulatory compliance and highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between decay heat and flow rates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear thermal dynamics
  • Familiarity with decay heat calculations
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics principles
  • Experience with thermal power plant operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of natural circulation in nuclear reactors
  • Learn about decay heat calculations and their implications in reactor safety
  • Explore fluid dynamics equations relevant to thermal systems
  • Research licensing requirements for small modular reactors (SMRs) like those from NuScale Power
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, thermal system analysts, and safety regulators involved in reactor design and operation will benefit from this discussion.

mudweez0009
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am having issues with some problems relating to a plant theoretically shut down on natural circulation, and calculating the core ΔT and natural circulation flow rate.. Can anyone provide some equations or theory I could use to assist me? I'm not familiar with this material and have spent hours searching Google and cannot find much.

Problem 1:
Givens:
Initial Decay heat = 2.5% rated thermal power.
Initial Core ΔT = 14 deg F
Final Decay Heat = 1% rated thermal power
Find: Final Core ΔT.

Problem 2:
Givens:
Initial natural circulation flow rate = 3.5% full power flow rate.
Initial Core ΔT = 15 deg F
Final Core ΔT = 8 deg F
Find: Final natural circulation flow rate


Homework Equations



I don't know any equations for this, I have searched for hours and cannot seem to find anything. If someone could reference me to any material they know of I can attempt a solution on my own first.

The Attempt at a Solution



(see 2. above)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thought about this overnight

make it a simple fluid flow problem.

piping configuration does not change.

driving head is in proportion to ΔT

flow is in proportion to √head

heat removed (power) is product of ΔT and flow

should be able to ratio things out

old jim
 
Jim Hardy has outlined the correct approach. You will find that delta T and flow are proportional to fractional powers of decay heat. I will leave the specifics to you as an exercise! (Hint: the exponents involve 2 and 3). At SONGS, I had to do this evaluation to show the NRC that operating at 70% power led to a better natural circulation flow to power ratio. Alas, we never restarted.
 
You might also check any licensing submittals that NuScale Power has made to the NRC for their SMR as their design does not used forced circulation and relies on natural circulation.
 
Okay I got the equations that we are supposed to use...

For power and core temp:
ΔT1/ΔT2=Q1(2/3)/Q2(2/3)
where, Q=power (%)

For natural circulation flow rate and core temp:
ΔT1/ΔT2=m12/m22


From here, the problems are incredibly easy. So yes, I guess it is just a ratio. Not sure how the equations come about, but I guess proofs are not my main concern at the moment. However... It's me, and I'm curious.

Thanks for the responses!
 
Her's a derivation:

W = Sqrt(Delta P)

W=Sqrt(Delta (rho*g*h))

W=Sqrt(Delta T*g*h) = Sqrt(Delta T)

Q=W*Delta T

Delta T = Q/W

W=Sqrt(Q/W)

W^2 = Q/W

Q=W^3

So, W=Q^(1/3)

Q=Q^(1/3)*Delta T

So, Delta T = Q^(2/3)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 2 people

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
3K