A M
- 83
- 16
Yes, I've already included in the post #20pinball1970 said:Vanadium 50 unstable? It's possible
The discussion revolves around the definition and understanding of naturally occurring elements, particularly in the context of isotopes and their presence on Earth. Participants explore the criteria that determine whether an element is considered naturally occurring, referencing various processes such as supernovae and radioactive decay.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition of naturally occurring elements. Multiple competing views remain regarding the criteria for classification, and the discussion reflects significant uncertainty about the implications of isotopes and their origins.
Participants note the limitations of definitions and the dependence on specific criteria for what constitutes "naturally occurring". The discussion highlights the complexity of the topic, particularly regarding the role of human intervention in the classification of elements.
Yes, I've already included in the post #20pinball1970 said:Vanadium 50 unstable? It's possible
Apologies and noted.A M said:Yes, I've already included in the post #20
According to what phyzguy said, there is no universally agreed-upon definition of what constitutes "naturally occurring". So why is it still being used?PeterDonis said:Also, most of the naturally occurring deuterium and lithium in the universe
A M said:According to what phyzguy said, there is no universally agreed-upon definition of what constitutes "naturally occurring". So why is it still being used?
So how many known elements are "naturally occurring"? All of them?PeterDonis said:Yes, there is no universally agreed upon single definition
A M said:So how many known elements are "naturally occurring"? All of them?