Nature of stationary points three variable functions

Click For Summary
To characterize the stationary points of the function F(x,y,z) = x² + xy + y² - 2z² + 3x - 2y + z, the critical point found is (-8/3, 7/3, 14). Determining the nature of this point involves analyzing the Hessian matrix of second derivatives. It is essential to check if the Hessian is positive definite, negative definite, or indefinite, which indicates whether the critical point is a local minimum, maximum, or saddle point, respectively. Techniques such as Cholesky factorization can simplify this process, allowing for efficient testing of definiteness without needing to calculate eigenvalues directly. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effectively analyzing functions of multiple variables.
AleksIlia94
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find and characterise the stationary points for F(x,y,z) = x2 + xy + y2 - 2z2 +3x -2y +z






The Attempt at a Solution


I found fx, fy, fz and let them equal to 0. Solving gives me the critical point (-8/3,7/3,14). From here I'm not sure how to determine the nature of this critical point. I know how to check given a two variable function, but for 3 I am a bit stuck. I think I have to find the determinant of the Hessian with all second derivative entries but is there an easier way than this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Was that z value a typo? It is certainly not "14".)

The best way to find the "nature" of the critical points of a general function of three or more variables is to first write the "true" second derivative. Not the partials. Just as the "true" first derivative of a function of three variables is a vector, the gradient,
\begin{bmatrix}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\end{bmatrix}
so the "true" second derivative is the matrix
\begin{bmatrix}\frac{\partial^2f}{\partial x^2} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x\partial y} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x\partial z}\\ \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y\partial x} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y^2} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y\partial z} \\ \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial z\partial x} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial z\partial y} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y^2}\end{bmatrix}

Set the x, y, and z equal to the coordinates of the critical point and find the eigenvalues. If they are all negative, that is a maximum, if all postive, a minimum, and, in any other case a "saddle point"- though you can characterize more fully by the number of positive and negative eigenvalues.
For this particular function, that is relatively straight forward.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AleksIlia94 said:

Homework Statement


Find and characterise the stationary points for F(x,y,z) = x2 + xy + y2 - 2z2 +3x -2y +z

The Attempt at a Solution


I found fx, fy, fz and let them equal to 0. Solving gives me the critical point (-8/3,7/3,14). From here I'm not sure how to determine the nature of this critical point. I know how to check given a two variable function, but for 3 I am a bit stuck. I think I have to find the determinant of the Hessian with all second derivative entries but is there an easier way than this?

Finding the determinant is not enough: you need to test if the Hessian H is positive definite or positive semi-definite, negative definite or negative semi-definite, or indefinite. The second-order optimality conditions at a *stationary point* are:
(1) Necessary for a local min: H is positive semi-definite (psd).
Sufficient for a strict local min: H is positive definite (pd).
(2) Necessary for a local max: H is negative semi-definite.
Sufficient for a strict local max: H is negative-definite.
Note: if H is indefinite, the point is neither a max nor a min---it is a "saddle point".
The easiest way to test for negative (semi-) definiteness of H is to test the positive (semi-) definiteness of K = -H.

There are some simple tests that allow you to bypass the details in some cases: (i) in order that H be psd it is necessary that all diagonal elements H(i,i) >= 0; (ii) if H is psd and H(i,i) = 0 for some i, then all elements in row and column i of H must also be zero (that is, we need H(i,j) = H(j,i) = 0); if this fails, H is indefinite. (iii) In order that H be pd it is necessary that all diagonal elements H(i,i) > 0. (Thus, if H has non-zero diagonal elements of opposite signs it is automatically indefinite.) All these things can be determined without additional work. If all these tests are "passed", then to test for psd or pd the standard way nowadays is to apply Cholesky factorization (which DOES apply to both psd and pd matrices, unlike what it says in some articles). We usually do not bother trying to find the eigenvalues unless we need them for some other purposes. (Cholesky factorization is so easy that I used to have it programmed into my HP hand-held calculator; you can easily do by hand matrices up to about 8x8.)

RGV
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K