Navier-Stokes equation for parallel flow

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Navier-Stokes equation for parallel flow in a river, specifically determining the flow velocity as a function of the perpendicular distance from the surface. The problem involves a river with a slope of 43 cm/km, a water depth of 2 m, and a kinematic viscosity of 10-6 m2/s. The derived equation for flow velocity is u(z) = (1/2)(ρ/μ)g sin(θ)z2 + [(1/2)(ρ/μ)g sin(θ)h + (1/h)u(0)]z + u(0), where the challenge lies in determining the constant u(0) at the surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Navier-Stokes equation for incompressible fluids.
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in fluid dynamics.
  • Familiarity with kinematic viscosity and its implications in fluid flow.
  • Basic calculus for solving partial differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions on fluid flow in the Navier-Stokes framework.
  • Explore methods for determining constants in fluid dynamics equations, particularly at boundaries.
  • Learn about shear stress and its role in fluid mechanics, especially at fluid interfaces.
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving the Navier-Stokes equations in complex flow scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid dynamics, particularly those working on problems involving the Navier-Stokes equations, as well as engineers and researchers focused on river flow modeling and analysis.

krabbie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

[/B]
Find an equation for the flow velocity of a river that is parallel to the bottom as a function of the perpendicular distance from the surface. Apply the boundary conditions given and solve, and find the velocity at the surface. Note that the coordinates are: x is the direction the water is flowing, z is perpendicular to the river bed, and y is perpendicular to x (so, y is the cross-current). Consider the surface of the river to be z=0, and the bottom to be z = -h.

The river is has a grade (slope) of 43cm per km. The water depth is 2m. The kinematic viscosity \mu/\rho = 10^{-6}m^2/s. The vertical gravitational acceleration is g = 9.8 m/s^2.

The given assumptions are:
  1. The flow obeys the Navier-Stokes equation for an incompressible flow.
  2. The current is steady.
  3. The density is uniform.
  4. The current is a parallel shear flow \vec{u}=u(z)\hat{e}^{(z)}.
  5. No fluid property varies in the direction parallel to the bottom(x).
  6. No fluid property varies in the cross-stream (y) direction.
  7. The gravity vector is -g\hat{e}^{'(z)},, where the prime indicates vertical in gravity aligned coordinates.
  8. At the river bottom, u=0.
  9. At the surface, du/dz = 0.

Homework Equations


Navier stokes for incompressible fluid:
\rho \frac{Du(z)}{Dt} =\rho g \hat{e}^{(x)}- \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \mu \nabla^2 u(z)

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I've managed to simplify N-S by noting that
\frac{\partial u(z)}{\partial t} = 0, \ \ \ \frac{\partial u(z)}{\partial x} = 0, \ \ \ \text{ so } \ \ \ \rho \frac{Du(z)}{Dt} =0,
\rho g_x = -\rho g \sin{\theta},
(I used \theta as the grade/slope for now, so I wouldn't have to deal with messy numbers)
\frac{\partial p}{\partial x} = 0,
since pressure is a fluid property and does not vary in the parallel stream, and finally
\mu \nabla^2 u(z) = \mu \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}u(z).
So, my pde is:
\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial z^2} u(z) = \frac{\rho}{\mu}g\sin{\theta},
which I have solved as
u(z) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\rho}{\mu}z^2 + k_1z + k_2.
Then, I found that the constants were: k_2 = u(0), and k_1 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\rho}{\mu}g \sin{\theta}h + \frac{1}{h}u(0), which makes my final equation
u(z) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\rho}{\mu}g\sin{\theta}z^2 + \left[\frac{1}{2}\frac{\rho}{\mu}g\sin{\theta}h + \frac{1}{h}u(0)\right]z + u(0).
Here is my problem: I next need to find u(0). But when I sub in 0 into my equation, I get:
u(0) = u(0),
which is not very illuminating. Did I mess up my solution, or is there another way to find u(0) that I am stupidly missing?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check every last detail, but you need to make use of the fact that the shear stress is equal to zero at z = 0.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K