Navigating Honors and AP Physics Textbooks: A Student's Experience

  • Thread starter Thread starter fastslip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbooks
AI Thread Summary
After two years in liberal arts, a student is transitioning to sciences and retaking foundational math and chemistry courses at a community college. They find the material easy and are seeking more challenging resources for physics, particularly honors and AP textbooks. There is confusion regarding the differences between honors and AP physics texts, as some institutions may use the same book for both levels but structure the courses differently. Recommendations include using Barron's AP Physics book for comprehensive coverage and avoiding Sparknotes Power Packs due to their poor quality. The discussion highlights the need for a solid understanding of physics concepts before tackling AP material, emphasizing that honors courses vary widely in rigor and may not always precede AP courses. The conversation underscores the importance of selecting appropriate texts based on individual learning needs and institutional practices.
fastslip
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I just finished two years of post secondary liberal arts. And I've decided to switch to sciences. Yay!

However, during high school I regrettably didnt pay much attention to the sciences, and may have even failed a few... So now I am at the local community college retaking math and chem 12 and physics for the first time. Now that I am actually applying myself and doing the problems I quite enjoy it and have no troubles. However, its not challenging enough. I even began looking over the 12 material and its more of the same. The topics are interesting but the problems are easy.

Anyways, I've read a lot of the reviews and sites about the honors and AP physics(B) textbooks used. But it seems they're quite contradictory of each other. Its also unclear which text is used for which level. It seems one may be used for both, in which case I am assuming they would divide the topics (or skip the harder problems?). In other cases, at one institution they may use a text for honors, while at a different institution they use that same text for AP. I could see how that would work given that the course was structured accordingly. However, in my situation there will be no lecture or assignments to supplement the text (besides the class that I'm in now which is just skimming the bare essentials).

Does anyone have any opinions on the current honors and AP texts being used (Algebra based). Or experience with them? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you could do is get a Barron's AP Physics book, that'll cover everything you'll need to know. Barron's is the best imho for AP classes, raised my US History grade by at least two points, probably three.

The Sparknotes Power Packs are terrible, avoid them like the plague. BUT, the SparkCharts that they make are very useful and helpful, look into those.
 
This book mentioned in this thread (Head First Physics) is algebra-based. It's designed to cover the mechanics topics in AP Physics B as a self-teaching supplement to a textbook. So you spend 44 pages exploring vectors through doing a treasure hunt, rather than being told "everything you might need to know about vectors" in about three pages.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=265264

It also covers the math as you go along, and doesn't assume you've already passed math / physics at lower levels. The thread links to some online samples so you can see if you think it's the kind of thing you're looking for.


(PS. I should probably mention here that I wrote it, and I hope it's OK to mention it in this context.)
 
Would it be advisable to use an AP text if I've never taken physics before? The math wouldn't be an issue. But shouldn't I have some exposure to physics thinking and problem solving before I hop into an AP introduction? Ideally, id rather go through an honors course before AP. But I am having a problem finding a strictly honors text, or any physics 11 for that matter. The text used for the class I am in now, heath (which is atrocious), covers the basics, but doesn't push you at all with regard to the concepts or problems. Do a lot of teachers just use the same text for both and divide the material? Whats the difference between honors and AP anyways, if theyre using the same text? Its going to be the same difficulty of problems just different topics. However, if youre at AP level you would obviously have more advanced math skills. So it wouldn't make sense to use the same text. This especially applies to calculus based.
 
Last edited:
AP level coursework is meant to teach you at the same level as you'd learn in an introductory course at the university level. So, any introductory university text would be suitable for AP level. "Honors" level doesn't have as specific of a meaning. It just means something more advanced than the standard curriculum. The rigor of an honors program varies widely from school to school. Some may very well teach from the same book as an AP level course, or they may teach from a somewhat easier book to introduce concepts before following that with a harder AP course later in the course sequence, or it could be the same text as the non-honors course, but more of the content is covered at a faster pace. Or, as in my high school, there was only honors and AP physics. Students who weren't in the honors courses weren't taught physics as a separate subject and had other science classes to choose from. Honors physics was taught in Junior year, and then AP physics was one of many AP options in senior year.

I hope that helps a bit to understand why there are so many different texts used in so many different schools.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top