Nearly free electron model - band gap

1 reply · 4K views · last reply
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
For a wavefunction at the Brillouin boundary we have:

[tex]\langle k|H|k\rangle = \epsilon_0 (\vec k)[/tex]
[tex]\langle k'|H|k'\rangle = \epsilon_0 (\vec k+\vec G)[/tex]
[tex]\langle k'|H|k\rangle = V_G = \frac{1}{L^3} \int e^{i(\vec k - \vec k') \cdot \vec r} V(r) d\vec r[/tex]
[tex]\langle k|H|k'\rangle = V_G^*[/tex]

Using degenerate perturbation theory, we diagonalize the hamiltonian and find the eigenvalues (energies) to be:
[tex]E_{\pm} = \epsilon_0 (\vec k) \pm |V_g|[/tex]

This would mean that for every ##k## right on the boundary we have a bandgap of ##2|V_G|##.Since ## V_G = \frac{1}{L^3} \int e^{i(\vec k - \vec k') \cdot \vec r} V(r) d\vec r##, shouldn't its magnitude be fixed at ##2|V_G##? However, in my notes for a periodic perturbation ##V_G = \tilde V cos(\frac{2n\pi}{a})## the gaps are increasing with ##k## (The bandgap at ##k=\frac{2\pi}{a}## seems to be twice as big as the bandgap at ##k=\frac{\pi}{a}##.

Plot of energy against wavevector k for a nearly free electron model: a parabolic band with dashed free-electron parabola, and small gaps opening at the zone boundaries at k = ±π/a and ±2π/a, labelled G = 2π/a and G = 4π/a, with 2|V_{2π/a}| marked as the gap at 2π/a.
 
Thanks for the bump greg. I think the potential here depends on ##k##, even though not stated. The constant band-gap thing only works when the potential is periodic like ##
V_G = \tilde V cos(\frac{2n\pi}{a})##.