Nebulae, as seen from the inside

  • Thread starter Thread starter Barnak
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Nebulae are often depicted in exaggerated colors in images, while actual observations through telescopes reveal them as gray blobs with faint color tints. A hypothetical observer inside a nebula would likely perceive stronger light intensity and potentially more color due to the density of ionized gases. Surface brightness remains constant regardless of distance, meaning stars would still appear as points of light, but with increased detail and color if viewed from within a nebula. The discussion suggests that simulating this experience could provide insights into the visual differences. Understanding these aspects enhances our appreciation of nebulae beyond their photographic representations.
Barnak
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
All the nice pictures of nebulae that we usually see everywhere are of false "exagerated" colors, or true colors from a long exposition. A nebula seen with the naked eye through a good telescope is usually a gray blob with maybe some weak/dark colour tint.

But what would see an hypothetical human observer, if he/she was standing right in the middle of the nebula ? Would the light seen with the naked eye be of stronger intensity/color ? To what point, compared to the usual over-exposed pictures ?

I guess nobody actually knows the answer to this question (obviously !), but I'm still wondering what is the "expert" opinion on this.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Actually it is very simple and well known. Surface brightness is independent of distance.
 
The stars appear as specks of light and we see somewhat their surface brightness, comparing Sirius to Betelgeuse for example. If they were closer and more densely packed, as they would be if perceived from within the nebula or a globular cluster, we could see more detail and possibly more color from ionized gases.
How much more would be an interesting challenge for a simulation.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top