Need help finding roots for a complex number using angles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the roots of the complex equation x3 = √(3) - i by converting it into polar form. The magnitude is calculated as 2, and the angle is determined to be -30 degrees. The user initially finds two roots, 3√(2) ∠ -10 and 3√(2) ∠ 110, but struggles with identifying the third root due to confusion over angle adjustments. Ultimately, it is clarified that while multiple angles can yield the same vector, only three unique roots exist, corresponding to the fundamental theorem of algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their polar representation
  • Familiarity with the fundamental theorem of algebra
  • Knowledge of vector magnitude and angle calculations
  • Basic trigonometry, specifically the tangent function and angle conversions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex numbers in polar form
  • Learn about the fundamental theorem of algebra and its implications for polynomial equations
  • Explore the concept of roots of unity and their geometric interpretations
  • Investigate the relationship between angles in polar coordinates and their periodicity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone interested in complex analysis or solving polynomial equations involving complex numbers.

fishspawned
Messages
66
Reaction score
16
Member warned that the homework template is required
so i am starting with the equation x3 = √(3) - i

first : change to a vector

magnitude = √[ (√(3))2 + 12] = 2
and angle = tan-1( 1/√(3) ) = 30 degrees
(in fourth quadrant)

so i have a vector of 2 ∠ - 30

so i plot the vector on the graph and consider that :

1. the fundamental theorum of algebra tells me i must have three roots.
2. multiplying two complex roots written as vectors will result in the magnitudes multiplied and the angles added together

so to get the root, i simply find the cube root of the magnitude and divide the angle by three

this gets me two initial answers:

3√(2) ∠ - 10
and
3√(2) ∠ 110

the question now comes up with the third root, because I am assuming there should be only one more. But I'm getting MANY more. Since the magnitude remains as 3√(2) then i simply need to find an angle that can be divided into three to get -30 (or 330) degrees.

well : if i take (360 + 330)/3 = 130, it works
if i take (-30 - 360)/3 = -110 , it works.
in fact any addition of 360 works, so I can only guess that these are not really roots. But they do produce entirely different complex numbers - all of them.

I have been assuming there are only three possible roots. Where is my logic going wrong here? Please help. I would greatly appreciate a little enlightenment
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fishspawned said:
so i am starting with the equation x3 = √(3) - i

first : change to a vector

magnitude = √[ (√(3))2 + 12] = 2
and angle = tan-1( 1/√(3) ) = 30 degrees
(in fourth quadrant)

so i have a vector of 2 ∠ - 30

so i plot the vector on the graph and consider that :

1. the fundamental theorum of algebra tells me i must have three roots.
2. multiplying two complex roots written as vectors will result in the magnitudes multiplied and the angles added together

so to get the root, i simply find the cube root of the magnitude and divide the angle by three

this gets me two initial answers:

3√(2) ∠ - 10
and
3√(2) ∠ 110

the question now comes up with the third root, because I am assuming there should be only one more. But I'm getting MANY more. Since the magnitude remains as 3√(2) then i simply need to find an angle that can be divided into three to get -30 (or 330) degrees.

well : if i take (360 + 330)/3 = 130, it works
(360 + 330)/3 = 230. It is the angle of the third root.
fishspawned said:
if i take (-30 - 360)/3 = -110 , it works.
(-30 - 360)/3 = -130, which is equivalent to 230, the previous result.
fishspawned said:
in fact any addition of 360 works, so I can only guess that these are not really roots. But they do produce entirely different complex numbers - all of them.

I have been assuming there are only three possible roots. Where is my logic going wrong here? Please help. I would greatly appreciate a little enlightenment

If you add any times 360° to the angle of the vector, you get the same vector. So you have only three different roots, and usually they are chosen form the interval [0, 360°) .
 
ha! a simple addition mistake threw me completely off. thank you so much. everything makes sense now and i can walk away from this .content
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K