Need help identifying which algebra rule was used

  • Thread starter Thread starter LogarithmLuke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
LogarithmLuke
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/derivative-of-1-x.211489/

In the last post, three last steps. He changes -h into -1, how does this work? I know that if you for example have h/h it's equal to 1 regardless of what value h has, since they're both the same value. I don't see that being applied here though. Could anyone help me out?

By the way, i tried messaging the person who posted it, but he is no longer active on this forum. The thread is also not open for further replies.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If
f(x+h)-f(x)=\frac{-h}{x(x+h)}
then
\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}=\frac{-1}{x(x+h)}

Is this what you're asking about?

To simplify it, it's basically equivalent to

If
A = \frac{-h}{B}
then
\frac{A}{h}=\frac{-1}{B}
because
\frac{A}{h}=\frac{\left(\frac{-h}{B}\right)}{h}=\frac{-h}{Bh}=\frac{-1}{B}

But more simply, you can just notice that A has a factor of h in the numerator, so to divide A by h, you're then cancelling that factor.
 
LogarithmLuke said:
In the last post, three last steps. He changes -h into -1, how does this work?
That's not what happened. What he did do was divide both sides by h.
 
What are you puzzled by? \frac{-h}{h}=-1
 
I know, i just didn't think about the equation that was there, because that's not how i learned to do it in school. It didn't cross my mind that he used the fact that there was an equation there to move further with the math problem. When I've done these we never used equations, just simple factoring.
 
LogarithmLuke said:
I know, i just didn't think about the equation that was there, because that's not how i learned to do it in school. It didn't cross my mind that he used the fact that there was an equation there to move further with the math problem. When I've done these we never used equations, just simple factoring.
There's a big difference between simplifying an expression (such as by factoring and combining terms and so on) and working with an equation. When you're working with an expression, there are only a few things you can do, but when you're working with an equation, there are lots of things you can do: add the same expression to both sides, multiply both sides by the same value, divide both sides by the same nonzero value, take logs of both sides, and many others.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top