Need help in solving DC transients question (Electrical Engg)

  • Thread starter Thread starter thesidjway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a complex electrical circuit problem involving transients in a DC circuit with resistors, capacitors, and inductors. Initial conditions for voltage and current are established, but participants struggle to derive a general solution for voltage across the capacitor (Vc) and current (Ix). Suggestions include redrawing the circuit for clarity, using Laplace transforms for simplification, and recognizing the circuit's parallel elements. There is a debate about the accuracy of initial voltage values and the derivative of Vc at t=0+, with some participants asserting that it should be infinite due to a step change. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying differential equations and the importance of clear communication in problem-solving.
thesidjway
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
http://i.imgur.com/nhBN1RJ.jpg << Huge image replaced with URL by Moderator >>

The attempt at a solution

I have been able to find
V(0+)=12
V(0-)=12
I(0-)=4

Not able to find a suitable way to get a general solution for Vc and Ix
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a tough problem!

First off, like all circuits, redraw it so it doesn't look so intimidating.

Slide the switch a little to the left so it lines up vertically with R1.

Take R3, take it's vertical branches and make them horizontal so they are just above the switch and the inductor.
Clearly R3 and the capacitor are in parallel.

I would also slide the inductor to the bottom horizontal branch. When the switch closes, it is then clear that R3, the capacitor and the inductor are in paralell.

Perhaps that will get you started a bit...
 
1. determine the initial conditions on L and C.
2. sum currents to zero at the right-hand node (only) and you're off.

One unknown node, one equation.
Do you know Laplace transforms? You don't have to, but it helps.
 
rude man said:
1. determine the initial conditions on L and C.
2. sum currents to zero at the right-hand node (only) and you're off.

One unknown node, one equation.
Do you know Laplace transforms? You don't have to, but it helps.

Laplace transforms would definitely be the easy way...but I get the feeling he is in the differential equation part of his studies...also known as the hard way.
 
psparky said:
Laplace transforms would definitely be the easy way...but I get the feeling he is in the differential equation part of his studies...also known as the hard way.

Still only one equation & one unknown node.
 
I hope the answer to differentiation of Vc at t=0+ would be -2V/sec
 
lazyaditya said:
I hope the answer to differentiation of Vc at t=0+ would be -2V/sec

I got infinities for all the t = 0+ derivatives. I'll check it some more later.
 
Last edited:
lazyaditya said:
I hope the answer to differentiation of Vc at t=0+ would be -2V/sec
You hope?

The circuit can be resolved into one comprising 3 parallel elements, R, C, and L, then look up or work out the D.E. for that 2nd order system's step response. That is the only way I can see (or the Laplace equivalent).
 
NascentOxygen said:
You hope?

The circuit can be resolved into one comprising 3 parallel elements, R, C, and L,. ...

,,, plus a fourth element.
 
  • #10
thesidjway said:
http://i.imgur.com/nhBN1RJ.jpg << Huge image replaced with URL by Moderator >>

The attempt at a solution

I have been able to find
V(0+)=12
V(0-)=12
I(0-)=4

Not able to find a suitable way to get a general solution for Vc and Ix

Your V(0+) and V(0-) are wrong. Hint: check sign on Vc(0+). Vc(0-) should be obvious. I assume by Vc is meant the right-hand side of C. If by "V(0+)" and "V(0-)" you just mean the voltage across C then you're OK.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
NascentOxygen said:
You hope?

The circuit can be resolved into one comprising 3 parallel elements, R, C, and L, then look up or work out the D.E. for that 2nd order system's step response. That is the only way I can see (or the Laplace equivalent).
I am sorry. I should have used "I think". I solved the problem roughly using general equation of voltage across capacitor Vc(t)=Vc(final)+[Vc(initial) - Vc(final)]e-t/RC. But after your reduced circuit i solved it in the following manner as per given in figures attached.
 

Attachments

  • photo 3.JPG
    photo 3.JPG
    40.5 KB · Views: 450
  • photo(1).JPG
    photo(1).JPG
    36 KB · Views: 485
  • photo 2(2).JPG
    photo 2(2).JPG
    40.9 KB · Views: 460
  • photo 1(2).JPG
    photo 1(2).JPG
    30.3 KB · Views: 453
  • #12
rude man said:
As usual I can't make out people's writings. But if you still got dvc/dt = -2V/s. that is clearly incorrect. At t = 0+ there is a step change in Vc and the derivative of a step is the delta function which is infini
Vc is marked on the schematic as the voltage across the capacitor plates, by essentially a left-pointing arrow.

Vc(0-) = Vc(0+) = +12V

Immediately the switch is thrown, the current into the capacitor changes from 0 to 2A to the RHS plate, this equates to

dVc(0) /dt = -2 V/s
 
  • #13
NascentOxygen said:
Vc is marked on the schematic as the voltage across the capacitor plates, by essentially a left-pointing arrow.

Vc(0-) = Vc(0+) = +12V

Immediately the switch is thrown, the current into the capacitor changes from 0 to 2A to the RHS plate, this equates to

dVc(0) /dt = -2 V/s

Yes. I was computing the voltge at the right-hand node. Either didn't see the vc as marked or it was added later.

Will look at the rest later, altho' the OP seems to have disappeared as usual.
 
  • #14
lazyaditya said:
I am sorry. I should have used "I think". I solved the problem roughly using general equation of voltage across capacitor Vc(t)=Vc(final)+[Vc(initial) - Vc(final)]e-t/RC. But after your reduced circuit i solved it in the following manner as per given in figures attached.

Are you doing the rest? The OP seems to have gone AWOL.
 
Back
Top