Need Help Understanding Misner Space Terminology

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantum Copy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Terminology
Quantum Copy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello! I'm having trouble understanding some of the terminology used to describe Misner (or Milne) Space. Some of the words that are troubling me are "Orbifold" (is this related at all to the cylindrical structure of the Misner universe?), "translation symmetry" (does this refer to the idea that the opposite "walls" of this space-time are identified with each other, so that if you enter one wall you emerge from the opposite one?), "axisymmetric Bianchi I universe" and "Klein bottle topology". I'm trying to understand more about Misner space, because I find it to be such a fascinating model, but I need some help with the terminology. Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Quantum Copy! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Quantum Copy said:
Some of the words that are troubling me are "Orbifold" (is this related at all to the cylindrical structure of the Misner universe?), "translation symmetry" (does this refer to the idea that the opposite "walls" of this space-time are identified with each other, so that if you enter one wall you emerge from the opposite one?), "axisymmetric Bianchi I universe" and "Klein bottle topology". I'm trying to understand more about Misner space, because I find it to be such a fascinating model, but I need some help with the terminology. Thanks so much!

"Orbifold" and "Bianchi I universe" … dunno. :redface:

"translation symmetry" … no, it just means it looks the same everywhere … see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Translational_symmetry

"Klein bottle topology" … look at the "Construction" section of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein_bottle :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top