That's not what I came up with...
First of all we have:
[tex]V_i = 50 m/s[/tex] (initial velocity)
[tex]\alpha = 45^\circ[/tex] (angle of trajectory)
[tex]\beta = 20^\circ[/tex] (angle of the hill)Therefore,
[tex]V_{ix} = V_i \times cos(\alpha) = V_i \times cos(45^\circ)[/tex] (initial horizontal velocity)
[tex]V_{iy} = V_i \times sin(\alpha) = V_i \times sin(45^\circ)[/tex] (initial vertical velocity)but since [itex]cos(45^\circ) = sin(45^\circ)[/tex], we have<br />
<br />
[tex]V_{ix} = V_{iy}[/tex]We know that<br />
<br />
[tex]t = \frac{X}{V_{ix}}[/tex]<br />
<br />
and<br />
<br />
[tex]Y = V_{iy} \cdot t - 4.9t^2[/tex]<br />
<br />
so<br />
<br />
[tex]Y = V_{iy}\cdot \frac{X}{V_{ix}} - 4.9\left(\frac{X^2}{V_{ix}^2}\right)[/tex]<br />
<br />
but since [itex]V_{iy} = V_{ix}[/tex], we have<br />
<br />
[tex]Y = X - 4.9 \cdot \left( \frac{X^2}{V_{ix}^2} \right)[/tex] (equation A)The slope of the hill is [itex]m = tan(\beta) = tan(20^\circ)[/tex] so the equation for the hill is<br />
<br />
[tex]Y = X \cdot tan(20^\circ)[/tex]Substituting for Y in the parabola equation (equation A) gives us<br />
<br />
[tex]X \cdot tan(20^\circ) = X - 4.9 \cdot \left( \frac{X^2}{V_{ix}^2} \right)[/tex]<br />
<br />
[tex]tan(20^\circ) = 1 - 4.9 \cdot \left( \frac{X}{V_{ix}^2} \right)[/tex]<br />
<br />
[tex]\left(\frac{4.9}{V_{ix}^2}\right) \cdot X = 1 - tan(20^\circ)[/tex]<br />
<br />
[tex]X = \frac{V_{ix}^2(1 - tan(20^\circ))}{4.9} = \frac{(50 \cdot cos(45^\circ))^2 \cdot (1 - tan(20^\circ))}{4.9}[/tex]<br />
<br />
[tex]X = \frac{35.355^2 \cdot 0.636}{4.9} = \frac{1250 \cdot 0.636}{4.9} = \frac{795.037}{4.9} = 162.252[/tex]Plug this value back into equation A, above, and you get Y = 59.055<br />
<br />
The distance up the his is found using the Pythagorean Theorem:<br />
<br />
[tex]D^2 = X^2 + Y^2 = 162.252^2 + 59.055^2 = 29813.373[/tex]<br />
<br />
and D = 172.665 m<br />
<br />
(note: I only rounded off in the text, not in my actual calculations)[/itex][/itex][/itex]